Impact of three commonly used blood sampling techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice: Taking the animal’s perspective

Neele Meyer,Mareike Kröger,Julia Thümmler,Lisa Tietze,Rupert Palme,Chadi Touma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238895
IF: 3.7
2020-09-08
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Laboratory mice are the most frequently used animals in biomedical research. In accordance with guidelines for humane handling, several blood sampling techniques have been established. While the effects of these procedures on blood quality and histological alterations at the sampling site are well studied, their impact on the animals' welfare has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, our study aimed to compare three commonly used blood sampling techniques regarding their effects on different indicators of animal welfare, including physiological and behavioural response stress parameters, including pain measures, home-cage behaviour and nest-building as well as exploratory activity and neophobia. Male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a single blood collection from either the vena facialis, the retrobulbar sinus or the tail vessel, or were allocated to the respective control treatment. While all blood sampling techniques led to an acute increase in plasma corticosterone levels, the response was strongest in animals that underwent sampling from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus. Similar results were observed when the time-course of adrenocortical activity was monitored via corticosterone metabolites from faecal samples. Blood collection from the vena facialis and the retrobulbar sinus also decreased exploration of novel stimuli, resulted in decreased nest-building activity and induced higher scores in the Mouse Grimace Scale. Moreover, locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviour were strongly affected after facial vein bleeding. Interestingly, tail vessel bleeding only induced little alterations in the assessed physiological and behavioural parameters. Importantly, the observed effects in all treatment groups were no longer detectable after 24 hours, indicating only short-term impacts. Thus, by also taking the animal's perspective and comprehensively assessing the severity of the particular sampling procedures, the results of our study contribute to Refinement within the 3R concept and allow researchers to objectively select the most appropriate and welfare-friendly blood sampling technique for a given experiment.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the impact of three commonly - used blood collection techniques on the welfare of laboratory mice. From the perspective of animals, it comprehensively compares the specific impacts of these blood collection methods on different welfare indicators (including physiological and behavioral stress response parameters). Specifically: 1. **Research Background**: - Laboratory mice are the most commonly used animal models in biomedical research. - Although a variety of blood collection techniques have been widely used, the impact of these techniques on the welfare of mice has not been fully studied. 2. **Research Objectives**: - Compare the different impacts of three commonly - used blood collection techniques (facial vein blood collection FVB, retro - orbital venous sinus blood collection RBB, tail vein blood collection TVB) on the welfare of mice. - Evaluate the physiological and behavioral changes of mice within the acute phase (such as 15 minutes after blood collection) and the intermediate phase (such as 24 hours after blood collection) by these blood collection techniques. 3. **Specific Questions**: - Will the blood collection techniques lead to an increase in the levels of stress hormones (such as corticosterone) in mice? - What are the impacts of different blood collection techniques on mice's exploration of new stimuli, nesting behavior, spontaneous activity, and anxiety - related behaviors? - Will pain be caused during the blood collection process? How can this pain be quantified through facial expressions (such as Mouse Grimace Scale, MGS)? 4. **Research Methods**: - Use male C57BL/6J mice for the experiment. - Through four independent experiments, respectively evaluate the impacts of different blood collection techniques on acute stress response, HPA - axis activation time course, spontaneous behavior, pain perception, and other aspects. - Set up control groups (handling control HCO and anesthesia control ACO) to exclude the interference of other factors. 5. **Expected Results**: - Researchers expect that different blood collection techniques will cause different degrees of stress response in mice, and more invasive blood collection methods may lead to more intense stress responses. - By comprehensively evaluating these indicators, researchers hope to provide a scientific basis for selecting the most appropriate and animal - welfare - friendly blood collection technique. In summary, this paper aims to provide guidance for optimizing the blood collection operations of laboratory mice through systematic research, thereby reducing the pain and stress caused to mice during the blood collection process and improving animal welfare.