Abstract:The question of how Velimir Khlebnikov’s work was perceived in China is among the little studied ones. We have a definite idea of the forms the Chinese theme took in Khlebnikov’s philosophical and aesthetic consciousness as a part of the general orientalist views of the Russian futurist poet. At the same time, the problem of the actual Chinese development of V. Khlebnikov’s artistic heritage (the dialogue among cultures presupposes their two-way connection, interlacement of assessments and judgments) remains open. Thus, the article highlights the most relevant literary and translation aspects of V. Khlebnikov’s reception by the Chinese. These two aspects of research are traditionally closely related, regardless of national culture issues. The measure and depth of literary interest in foreign-language poetry is determined by the volume of translated texts; in a similar degree, the stability and quality of translation corresponds to the literary vector of the foreign word perception. For the Russian research into Far Eastern literature, this state of affairs is quite axiomatic (since without a preliminary theoretical and historical-literary, as well as hermeneutic analyses, it is impossible to truly understand the poetics of ancient Chinese or medieval Japanese lyrical poetry; all other approaches will be considered amateurish with good reason, which, however, does not exclude the presence of a special, “naïve” charm of these translations from Chinese or Japanese, taken in isolation from the original). The above thesis is also applicable to the Chinese research into Russian literature (Chinese studies of Russian literature), which has been intensively developing in recent years. The article traces the stages in scientific and philological studies of V. Khlebnikov’s work in China, explains the reasons for Chinese interest in the Silver Age in general and the work of the author of the “Khadzhi Tarkhan” in particular, analyzes the strategies of individual translations of Khlebnikov’s poems into Chinese, taking into account the increased complexity in the transmission of “zaum'” by means of the linguistic system so strikingly different in its internal structure and writing system from Russian.

Soviet engravings and the Chinese writer Lu Xun

The Collection of Roots and the Reconstruction of Modern East Zhejiang Scholarship Chinese Full Text

Lu Xun and N. V. Gogol: the unexplored field of poetry

On the Critical Reception of Lu Xun's Early Classical-Style Essays of the Japan Period

On Cold Reception of Russian-Soviet Literature in China Chinese Full Text

"Never to Mind Whether it is Spring or Winter": Readers Reception,Political Turbulence and the Influence on Book Culture of Lu Xun's Works

The Many Voices of Duying: Revisiting the Disputed Essays Between Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren

Evolution of the geographical image of the USSR in the presentation of Chinese writers (on example of Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu)

A Systematic Review of Lu Xun's Cover Design Research Over the Last Two Decades

Reception of Alexander Herzen’s ‘My Past and Thoughts’ in China: Problems of Study and Influence

Title:Translation and Introduction of Surrealism in China

Traditions of the Soviet Academy of Art History in the theses of the Chinese students of I. E. Repin Institute of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture at the turn of the 1950s – 1960s (based on the archival materials)

Lu Xun and Contemporary Chinese Literature

Khlebnikov in China

Reflection of Aesthetic Concepts of Russian Realism in Chinese Visual Art

George Kin Leung’s English Translation of Lu Xun’s A Q Zhengzhuan

Sino-Soviet Relations under Class Discourse: Reading and Criticism of Wuthering Heights in China (1949–1966)

Lu Xun and Literature Monthly

The poetics and functions of the Chinese national costume in the works of S. M. Tretyakov

The image of China in Yuri Galich’s travelogues “Golden Ships. Wanderings”

An Overview of Foreign Literature Studies in China from 1949 to 2019