Expanded Yet Restricted: A Mini Review of the Soft Skills Literature

Anna K. Touloumakos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02207

IF: 3.8

2020-09-04

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:There has been a progressively heightened preoccupation with soft skills among education stakeholders such as policymakers, educational psychologists, and researchers. Soft skill curricula have been considered these days and developed not only for graduates and as on-the-job training programs but also for students across all levels of education. However, different people mean different things when referring to soft skills. This review presents evidence to suggest that the use of the term "soft skills" has expanded to encompass a variety of qualities, traits, values, and attributes, as well as rather distinct constructs such as emotional labor and lookism. It is argued here that these infinite categories of things can be skills because soft skills research is primarily focused on what are the needs and requirements in the world of work. This approach is problematic because it assigns characteristics to soft skills, which in turn affect the design of the soft skills curricula. For example, soft skills are often construed as decontextualized behaviors, which can be acquired and transferred unproblematically. The paper proposes that an in-depth and embedded approach to studying soft skills should be pursued to reach a consensus on what they are and how to develop them because otherwise they will always be expanded before restricted (as they have become ambiguous) in their meaning and definition.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the ambiguity and extensiveness of the concept of "soft skills" in the fields of education and work. Specifically, the author points out:

1. **Ambiguity of the concept**: Although the term "soft skills" has attracted increasing attention among educational stakeholders (such as policy - makers, educational psychologists and researchers), and soft - skills courses are not only for graduates and on - the - job training programs, but also extended to students at all levels of education, different people have very different understandings of "soft skills". This has led to the content covered by "soft skills" being too broad, including various qualities, traits, values and attributes, and even including emotional labor and appearance.

2. **Inconsistency of definitions**: Due to the lack of a unified definition, the "soft skills" categories and lists in different studies and literatures often overlap and are inconsistent. This inconsistency affects the design of soft - skills courses, because these courses often regard soft skills as de - contextualized behaviors that can be unconditionally acquired and transferred.

3. **Problems with research methods**: Most of the existing soft - skills research is based on the dismantling of work experience to meet specific job requirements. Although this method is helpful for identifying specific skill requirements, it fails to deeply explore the essence and characteristics of soft skills, thus leading to limitations in the understanding and development of soft skills.

To address these problems, the author suggests adopting a more in - depth and embedded approach to study soft skills in order to reach a consensus on soft skills and better design and implement soft - skills courses.