The ESG–financial performance relationship: Does the type of employee board representation matter?

Mehdi Nekhili,Amal Boukadhaba,Haithem Nagati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12345
2020-10-14
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Manuscript Type</h3><p>Empirical</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Research Question/Issue</h3><p>We examine the impact of two differing types of employee board representation (i.e., labour board representation and employee‐shareholder board representations) on environmental, social and corporate governance components of ESG performance and the moderating role of each type of employee board representation on the relationship between ESG performance and the firm's market value.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Research Findings/Insights</h3><p>Using a propensity score matching approach on a sample of French firms listed in the SBF 120 index from 2007 to 2017, our findings reveal that labour board representatives act in the opposite direction to employee‐shareholder board representatives, by focusing exclusively on improving social performance and reducing environmental and corporate governance performance. The way employees are represented on the board of directors also moderates the corporate ESG‐financial performance relationship differently.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Theoretical/Academic Implications</h3><p>Employee‐directors are not a homogenous group. The differentiation between the two types of employee directors (i.e., labour board representatives and employee‐shareholder board representatives) would bring a deeper understanding of the effect of stakeholders' representation on the board.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Practitioner/Policy Implications</h3><p>Our results will be of interest to governance policy makers since they provide them with a fresh understanding of the key role of employee board representation. A meaningful inference to be drawn from our findings is that employee ownership and the representation of employees on the board as employee shareholders may bring about fundamental changes in employees' attitudes and behaviour on the board and may, in this regard, be considered as a credible way of generating social harmony and constructive relationships between employees and shareholders.</p></section>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?