Abstract:Of the existing theoretical formulas for the h-index, those recently suggested by Burrell (J Informetr 7:774–783, 2013b) and by Bertoli-Barsotti and Lando (J Informetr 9(4):762–776, 2015) have proved very effective in estimating the actual value of the h-index Hirsch (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572, 2005), at least at the level of the individual scientist. These approaches lead (or may lead) to two slightly different formulas, being based, respectively, on a “standard” and a “shifted” version of the geometric distribution. In this paper, we review the genesis of these two formulas—which we shall call the “basic” and “improved” Lambert-W formula for the h-index—and compare their effectiveness with that of a number of instances taken from the well-known Glänzel–Schubert class of models for the h-index (based, instead, on a Paretian model) by means of an empirical study. All the formulas considered in the comparison are “ready-to-use”, i.e., functions of simple citation indicators such as: the total number of publications; the total number of citations; the total number of cited paper; the number of citations of the most cited paper. The empirical study is based on citation data obtained from two different sets of journals belonging to two different scientific fields: more specifically, 231 journals from the area of “Statistics and Mathematical Methods” and 100 journals from the area of “Economics, Econometrics and Finance”, totaling almost 100,000 and 20,000 publications, respectively. The citation data refer to different publication/citation time windows, different types of “citable” documents, and alternative approaches to the analysis of the citation process (“prospective” and “retrospective”). We conclude that, especially in its improved version, the Lambert-W formula for the h-index provides a quite robust and effective ready-to-use rule that should be preferred to other known formulas if one’s goal is (simply) to derive a reliable estimate of the h-index.

The h-index formalism

On the meaning of the h-index

A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators

The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks

The inconsistency of the h-index

A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists

Extensions of Egghe g-index: Improvements of Hirsch h-index

Does the $h_α$ index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R

Analysis of h-index for research awards

A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index hm Accounting for Multiple Co-authors

A unification of three models for the h‐index

The predictability of the Hirsch index evolution

The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor

The i100-index, i1000-index and i10,000-index: expansion and fortification of the Google Scholar h-index for finer-scale citation descriptions and researcher classification

The inconsistency of h-index: a mathematical analysis

Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science

Comprehensive evaluation of h-index and its extensions in the domain of mathematics

Understanding the ‘g-index’ and the ‘e-index’

A rationale for the Hirsch-index rank-order distribution and a comparison with the impact factor rank-order distribution