Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon

Thales A. P. West,Jan Börner,Erin O. Sills,Andreas Kontoleon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004334117
IF: 11.1
2020-09-14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance There are efforts to integrate the reduced carbon emissions from avoided deforestation claimed by voluntary REDD+ projects into national greenhouse gas emission inventories. This requires careful consideration of whether and how much of the reduced carbon emissions can be attributed to projects. However, credible evidence on the effectiveness of such voluntary activities is limited. We adopted the quasi-experimental synthetic control method to examine the causal effects of 12 voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. We compared these ex-post estimates of impacts with the reductions in forest loss claimed by those projects based on ex-ante baselines. Results suggest that the accepted methodologies for quantifying carbon credits overstate impacts on avoided deforestation and climate change mitigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?