Abstract:Background: Critical limb threatening-ischemia (CLTI) can be due to an extensive involvement of both the aorto-iliac (AI) and the infra-inguinal (II) districts and the efficacy of and extensive AI+II vs. only AI revascularization is still matter of debate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome in CLTI patients with concomitant AI and II peripheral artery disease (PAD) after revascularization limited to the AI or extended also to the II segment. Methods: Patients with CLTI and concomitant AI (TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus: C-D) and II PAD (Global-Anatomic-Staging-System: II-III) from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were compared according to type of revascularization: limited to AI vs. AI+II. Common femoral and profunda artery endarterectomy (C/P-TEA) was considered in both groups. Perioperative mortality, limb salvage, foot healing (within 6 months after surgery), necessity of adjunctive revascularization and survival were analyzed and the follow-up performed with clinical and duplex assessment every six months. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the composite event of limb salvage, wound healing and necessity of adjunctive revascularization during follow-up in AI vs. AI+II groups, through Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: Over a total of 1105 peripheral revascularizations for CLTI, 96 (8.7%) patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. AI revascularization was performed in 38 (40%) and AI+II in 58 (60%). AI and AI+II groups were similar for preoperative risk factors and extension of PAD with the exception of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification (ASA IV: 50% vs. 25%, P=0.02, respectively). The AI group was treated with angioplasty/stenting in all cases and with C/P-TEA in 20 (52%) cases. In the AI+II group, the AI district was treated by angioplasty/stenting in 55 (95%) and by aorto-bifemoral bypass in 3 (5%) and C/P-TEA in 20 (34%). The II revascularization was performed by femoro-popliteal/tibial bypass in 27 (47%); and endovascular revascularization in 31 (53%) patients. Minor amputation rate was similar between AI and AI+II revascularization (39% vs. 48%, P=1.0); length of stay, blood transfusion units, were significantly higher in AI+II group: 7±4 days vs. 12±5 days, P=0.04 and 2±2 vs. 4±2, P=0.02. The 30-day mortality was 7% with no differences according to the type of treatment. At a mean follow-up of 28±10 months, the overall limb salvage was 87±4% with similar results in AI vs. AI+II revascularization (95±5% vs. 86±6%; P=0.56). AI had a higher necessity of adjunctive revascularization and lower wound healing compared to AI+II (18±9% vs. 0%, P=0.02; 72% vs. 100%, P=0.001, respectively). AI+II was associated with a better primary endpoint compared to AI (87±5% vs. 53±9%, P=0.01), and it was confirmed in Rutherford 5 and 6 patients (100% vs. 54±14%, P=0.01; 78±9 vs. 50±13%, P=0.04), and no differences in Rutherford 4 (100% vs. 100%). Cox regression analysis confirmed AI+II as an independent protector for the primary outcome (hazard ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.71). Conclusions: CLTI with extensive PAD disease can be treated with limited AI revascularization in Rutherford 4 patients however in case of category 5 or 6 an extensive revascularization (AI+II) should be considered.

Effects of Infra-malleolar Status According to Global Limb Anatomic Staging System on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

global limb anatomic Staging System Score correlates with the clinical outcomes in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients

Severe inframalleolar disease is an independent predictor of adverse limb outcomes after endovascular revascularization in chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Outcomes of revascularization of stenotic inframalleolar lesions in chronic limb‐threatening ischemia

Primary Limb-Based Patency for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Treated with Endovascular Therapy Based on the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System.

Impact of Infrapopliteal Revascularisation Establishing In Line Flow to the Wound in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

Validation of Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (GLASS) in patients with hemodialysis and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia after endovascular treatment

Limb outcomes based on limb severity and anatomic complexity following infrapopliteal vein bypass for Japanese patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Amputation-Free Survival, WIfI Stage, and GLASS Classifications in Distal Crural or Pedal Bypass for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Role of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in Predicting Outcomes of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Patients Treated by Drug-Coated Balloons

WIfI Classification-Based Analysis Of Risk Factors For Outcomes In Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Endovascular Revascularization Therapy

Predictors of Delayed Wound Healing after Successful Isolated Below-the-knee Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Ischemic Foot Ulcers.

Association Between Wound Healing and the Japanese Below-the-Knee Chronic Total Occlusion Score in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Endovascular Therapy

Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (Wifi) Classification System And Its Predictive Ability Concerning Amputation-Free Survival, Mortality And Major Limb Amputation In A Portuguese Population: A Single Center Experience

Clinical Outcomes After Distal Bypass in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia due to Connective Tissue Disease

A Review of WIfI Clinical Staging to Predict Outcomes in Patients With Threatened Limbs

Influence of Inframalleolar Modifier P0/P1 on Wound Healing in Bypass Surgery versus Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Evaluation of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Intervention for Femoropopliteal Disease

Anatomical and clinical factors associated with infrapopliteal arterial bypass outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

The Vital Role of Plastic Surgeons in Multidisciplinary Care for Wound Healing After Endovascular Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Japan

Aorto-iliac and infrainguinal artery occlusive disease: different revascularization options according to the critical limb threatening ischemia category