New prognostic system based on inflammation and liver function predicts prognosis in patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: A validation study
Toshifumi Tada,Takashi Kumada,Atsushi Hiraoka,Kazuya Kariyama,Joji Tani,Masashi Hirooka,Koichi Takaguchi,Masanori Atsukawa,Shinya Fukunishi,Ei Itobayashi,Kunihiko Tsuji,Kazuto Tajiri,Hironori Ochi,Toru Ishikawa,Satoshi Yasuda,Chikara Ogawa,Hidenori Toyoda,Takeshi Hatanaka,Takashi Nishimura,Satoru Kakizaki,Kazuhito Kawata,Noritomo Shimada,Fujimasa Tada,Kazuhiro Nouso,Akemi Tsutsui,Hideko Ohama,Asahiro Morishita,Takuya Nagano,Norio Itokawa,Tomomi Okubo,Taeang Arai,Hisashi Kosaka,Michitaka Imai,Atsushi Naganuma,Shinichiro Nakamura,Yohei Koizumi,Masaki Kaibori,Hiroko Iijima,Yoichi Hiasa,the Real‐life Practice Experts for HCC (RELPEC) Study Group and the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Experts from 48 clinics in Japan (HCC 48) Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5495
IF: 4.711
2022-12-11
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:The neo‐Glasgow prognostic score, based on C‐reactive protein level and albumin‐bilirubin grade, was developed as a new biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. High neo‐Glasgow prognostic scores were associated with poor outcomes in patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.In comparison with the Glasgow prognostic score, the neo‐Glasgow prognostic score was associated with a lower Akaike information criterion value and higher c‐index for overall survival. Aim Recently, the neo‐Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), a composite biomarker determined by the C‐reactive protein level and albumin–bilirubin grade, was developed to predict outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who undergo hepatic resection. The present research investigated whether the neo‐GPS could predict prognosis in HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev). Methods A total of 421 patients with HCC who were treated with Atez/Bev were investigated. Results Multivariate Cox hazards analysis showed that a GPS of 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 1.711; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.106–2.646) and a GPS of 2 (HR, 4.643; 95% CI, 2.778–7.762) were independently associated with overall survival. Conversely, multivariate Cox hazards analysis showed that a neo‐GPS of 1 (HR, 3.038; 95% CI, 1.715–5.383) and a neo‐GPS of 2 (HR, 5.312; 95% CI, 2.853–9.890) were also independently associated with overall survival in this cohort. Additionally, cumulative overall survival rates differed significantly by GPS and neo‐GPS (p
oncology