Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Framing Effects in the Chinese Stock Market: A Test of New Measurement to Firm-Special Behavioral Characteristic

Sources of the Stock Price Fluctuations in Chinese Equity Market

An Experimental Study on the Influence of the Expenditure of Cognitive Resource on Framing Effect

Market framing bias and cross-sectional stock returns

Has Chinese Stock Market Become Efficient? Evidence From A New Approach

New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Narrow Framing and Under-Diversification: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Households

Short-Term Price Contrarian and Volume Effect in China's Stock Market

A Study of Stock Returns in China's A-share Market Based on the Fama-French Three-factor Model

A Composite Four-Factor Model in China

Integrating narrow and wide framing disposition effect: A novel approach incorporating perceived risk and realized asset performance

Upward and Downward Multifractality and Efficiency of Chinese and Hong Kong Stock Markets

The "Disposition Effect": Behavioral Study of Mutual Fund in China

RETAIL INVESTORS’ BIASED BELIEFS ABOUT STOCKS THAT THEY HOLD: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SPLIT SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM

The Value and Size Effect — Are There Firm-Specific-Risks in China’s Domestic Stock Markets?

The Framing Effect on Management Accounting Decisions——Illustrated by Transfer Pricing Decisions

Financing anomaly, mispricing and cross-sectional return predictability

Testing the Validity of the Multi-Factor Model in the Chinese Stock Market

A revised comparison between FF five-factor model and three-factor model,based on China's A-share market

On the Cross-Sectional Risk Premium of Chinese Stock Market