Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

Constant carbon pricing increases support for climate action compared to ramping up costs over time

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Declining CO2 price paths

Who can cope with a carbon tax? The role of financial consequences in policy acceptance among German homeowners

The surprisingly inexpensive cost of state-driven emission control strategies

How expensive should CO2 be? Fuel for the political debate on optimal climate policy

Does Pricing Carbon Mitigate Climate Change? Firm-Level Evidence from the European Union Emissions Trading System

How Do We Move towards a Greener and Socially Equitable Future? Identifying the Trade-Offs of Accepted CO2 Pricing Revenues in Germany

Addressing Climate Change Through a Low-Cost, High-Impact Carbon Tax

Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes: A cost-efficient solution built on a pre-existing reward-based climate policy

EU carbon prices signal high policy credibility and farsighted actors

Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Carbon Pricing Impacts on Four Pollutants: A Cross-Country Analysis

Social Cost of Carbon as an International Benchmark to Drive Countries' Carbon Pricing during the Transition

Key factors affecting carbon prices from a time-varying perspective

Examining the effects of gasoline prices on public support for climate policies

Economics of carbon-dioxide abatement under an exogenous constraint on cumulative emissions

Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

Climate Policy Enhances Efficiency: A Macroeconomic Portfolio Effect

The Carbon Ask: effects of climate policy on the value of fossil fuel resources and the implications for technological innovation