Abstract:Despite their potential for supporting the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, comparative extinction risk models have faced limited uptake since their output cannot be directly used to inform the Red List assessments. We addressed this gap by predicting the probability of global bird species to be threatened under each individual Red List criterion (as opposed to predicting Red List categories). Our approach outperforms classical models at identifying threatened species and provides outputs that can effectively support the work of assessors. Our study yields key insights that could amplify the uptake of extinction risk models into Red List assessments. Comparative extinction risk analysis—which predicts species extinction risk from correlation with traits or geographical characteristics—has gained research attention as a promising tool to support extinction risk assessment in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. However, its uptake has been very limited so far, possibly because existing models only predict a species' Red List category, without indicating which Red List criteria may be triggered. This prevents such approaches to be integrated into Red List assessments. We overcome this implementation gap by developing models that predict the probability of species meeting individual Red List criteria. Using data on the world's birds, we evaluated the predictive performance of our criterion‐specific models and compared it with the typical criterion‐blind modelling approach. We compiled data on biological traits (e.g. range size, clutch size) and external drivers (e.g. change in canopy cover) often associated with extinction risk. For each specific criterion, we modelled the relationship between extinction risk predictors and species' Red List category under that criterion using ordinal regression models. We found criterion‐specific models were better at identifying threatened species compared to a criterion‐blind model (higher sensitivity), but less good at identifying not threatened species (lower specificity). As expected, different covariates were important for predicting extinction risk under different criteria. Change in annual temperature was important for criteria related to population trends, while high forest dependency was important for criteria related to restricted area of occupancy or small population size. Our criteria‐specific method can support Red List assessors by producing outputs that identify species likely to meet specific criteria, and which are the most important predictors. These species can then be prioritised for re‐evaluation. We expect this new approach to increase the uptake of extinction risk models in Red List assessments, bridging a long‐standing research‐implementation gap.

IUCN Red List and the value of integrating genetics

Genetic diversity and IUCN Red List status

Global assessment of effective population sizes: Consistent taxonomic differences in meeting the 50/500 rule

Quantifying the IUCN Red List: Using historical assessments to calculate future extinction risk

Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species

The Ne/N ratio in applied conservation

Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof‐of‐Concept From Mammalian Whole‐Genome Resequencing Data

Genetic factors are less considered than demographic characters in delisting species

Do estimates of contemporary effective population size tell us what we want to know?

Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments

Calculating population reductions of invertebrate species for IUCN Red List assessments

Leveraging genomic load estimates to optimize captive breeding programmes

Immediate Genetic Augmentation and Enhanced Habitat Connectivity Are Required to Secure the Future of an Iconic Endangered Freshwater Fish Population

Too simple, too complex, or just right? Advantages, challenges, and guidance for indicators of genetic diversity

Practical considerations regarding estimating Ne when generations overlap

Assessing extinction risk from geographic distribution data in Neotropical freshwater fishes

Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing With the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics

Estimation of contemporary effective population size in plant populations: limitations of genomic datasets

Tiny estimates of the Ne /N ratio in marine fishes: Are they real?

Reducing the number of Data Deficient plant species

Recommendations for the use of critical terms when applying IUCN red-listing criteria to bryophytes