Abstract:Environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) scores have been widely touted as indicators of share price resilience during the COVID-19 humanitarian crisis. We undertake extensive analyses to investigate this claim and present robust evidence that, once the firm’s industry affiliation and accounting- and market-based measures of risk have been properly controlled for, ESG scores offer no such positive explanatory power for returns during COVID-19. Specifically, ESG is insignificant in fully specified returns regressions for the first quarter of 2020 COVID crisis period, and it is weakly negatively associated with returns during the market’s “recovery” period in the second quarter of 2020. Industry affiliation, market-based measures of risk, and accounting-based variables that capture the firm’s financial flexibility (liquidity and leverage) and their investments in internally-developed intangible assets together dominate the explanatory power of the COVID returns models. Relying on data from the global financial crisis (“GFC”) of 2008-2009, we develop parsimonious logit-based models to explain GFC period “winners” and “losers” (i.e., top and bottom deciles of returns performance), and we use these fitted models to predict winners and losers in the subsequent COVID crisis. Employing receiver operating characteristic (“ROC”) curves, we demonstrate that various accounting- and market-based models perform well both within-sample for the GFC period, as well as out-of-sample for the COVID crisis, but that ESG does not meaningfully add to the combined accounting and market models’ performance. We develop hedge strategies that go long (short) in firms during the COVID crisis that the GFC-based models predict will be winners (losers) and document that these predictions yield highly significant abnormal returns. Once again, ESG offers no enhancement to the out-of-sample returns performance. We conclude that celebrations of ESG as an important resilience factor in times of crisis are, at best, premature.

Human Capital efficiency and equity funds’ performance during the COVID-19 pandemic

Human capital efficiency, performance, market, and volatility timing of asian equity funds during COVID-19 outbreak

The impact of human capital efficiency on Latin American mutual funds during Covid-19 outbreak

Downside Risk in Dow Jones Islamic Equity Indices: Precious Metals and Portfolio Diversification Before and after the COVID-19 Bear Market

Covid-19 and asset management in EU: a preliminary assessment of performance and investment styles

How Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Change the Disposition Effect in Fund Investors?

Behavioral finance and market efficiency in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: does fear drive the market?

Assessing Energy Mutual Funds: Performance, Risks, and Managerial Skills

Covid-19’s effect on the alpha and beta of a US stock Exchange Traded Fund

Herding behavior during the Covid-19 pandemic: a comparison between Asian and European stock markets based on intraday multifractality

ESG performance in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: cross-country evidence

The investment behavior of China-connected mutual funds in the pandemic: Information advantage through operational link

ESG Didn’t Immunize Stocks Against the Covid-19 Market Crash

Market Efficiency and Stock Investment Loss Aversion Guide During COVID-19 Pandemic Events: The Case for Applying Data Mining

Employee Compensation, Training and Financial Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Information interruption and hedge fund performance: Evidence from lockdown

Information Flow from COVID-19 Pandemic to Islamic and Conventional Equities: An ICEEMDAN-Induced Transfer Entropy Analysis

Herd Mentality Amongst Equity Investors During COVID-19: Evidences from Saudi Arabia

CEO GENDER AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Disaster Resilience and Asset Prices

The Effect of ESG Activities on Financial Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic—Evidence from Korea