Optimizing the Dosing Regimens of Tigecycline against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Treatment of Intra-abdominal and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Wichai Santimaleeworagun,Jatapat Hemapanpairoa,Dhitiwat Changpradub,Sudaluck Thunyaharn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2020.52.3.345
2020-01-01
Infection and Chemotherapy
Abstract:Tigecycline was previously considered to have activity against vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> (VRE) isolates, but the optimal dose was not clarified. Thus, this study assessed the <i>in vitro</i> activity of tigecycline against clinical VRE isolates to determine its optimal regimens for complicated intra-abdominal (cIAIs) and complicated skin/soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). We used Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response for the ratio of the free area under the curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (<i>f</i>AUIC<sub>24</sub>), which were 17.9 and 6.9 for treating cSSTIs and cIAIs, respectively. All clinical isolates were <i>Enterococcus faecium</i>. Only a maintenance dose of 200 mg/day tigecycline gave the target attainment of <i>f</i>AUIC<sub>24</sub> &gt;17.9, and PTA exceeded 90% for MIC ≤0.38 μg/mL. Meanwhile, this dose gave the target attainment of <i>f</i>AUIC<sub>24</sub> &gt;6.9, and PTA exceeded 90% for MIC ≤1 μg/mL. All simulated tigecycline dosing regimens met the <i>f</i>AUIC<sub>24</sub> targets more than 90% of the cumulative fraction of response. Despite its apparent efficacy, a daily tigecycline dose of 200 mg is recommended for VRE isolates with MICs of ≤0.38 μg/mL and ≤1 μg/mL for treating cSSTIs and cIAIs, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?