Abstract:Background/Context: The underrepresentation of students from lower socioeconomic status (LSES) backgrounds among college graduates with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees, and consequently in STEM occupations, is a concern with respect to reducing, perpetuating, or increasing social inequality. The loss of their talent and creativity also poses a threat to the future of the U.S. economy, scientific knowledge generation, and national security. This study uses two theoretical frameworks—bounded rationality and effectively maintained inequality (EMI)—to identify the pathways toward STEM for students from lower and higher SES backgrounds, given the well-documented differences in their family resources and opportunities to learn, amount of cultural capital, and risk aversions. Purpose: The study identifies factors related to LSES students’ odds of declaring and graduating with a STEM degree and tests whether those factors work in similar ways for students from higher socioeconomic groups. The study contributes to understanding the roots of the underrepresentation of LSES students in STEM majors and occupations. Research Design: We use a mixed-method sequential explanatory design that draws from two complementary sources of data, one quantitative and one qualitative. Using multilevel logit models, the quantitative data set explores how SES influences students’ choices regarding whether to pursue a STEM degree. The qualitative data set further explores the relationships found in the quantitative data specifically for the case of LSES students through analysis of in-depth interviews. Findings: Quantitative analysis finds that LSES students’ socioeconomic background is related to their reduced opportunities to learn and reduced information resources, lessening their adequate academic preparation for success in STEM majors. Qualitative data indicate that risk avoidance—specifically, perceptions of risk and ideas of future income stability—play an important role in LSES students’ decisions to major in STEM. In addition, LSES students possess insufficient data to make informed decisions while in high school regarding course selection that would better enable their pathways into STEM, and to navigate into college success. Conclusions: To foster equity in access to postsecondary educational resources, it is crucial to offer all students access to high-quality academic opportunities before enrolling in college. Furthermore, high schools must ensure that students have access to explicit information about college and what various majors entail. We advocate that all students should have information on all options available so they can make well-informed decisions that match their abilities and preferences. Students’ access to and preferences for certain majors should not be conditioned on their socioeconomic background.

Examining the Career Self-Management Model Among Native American Students With STEM Career Goals

Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering.

Professionals’ Identification Within and Across Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields

Academic Satisfaction of Women Students of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Roles of Discrimination, Proactive Personality, and Critical Consciousness

Social Cognitive Career Theory Predictors of Goal Persistence in African American College Students With Disabilities

Navigating the Career Development of Students With Disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Social Cognitive Predictors of Mexican American High School Students’ Math/Science Career Goals

Influence of Career Awareness on STEM Career Interests: Examining the Roles of Self-Efficacy, Outcome Expectations, and Gender

Balancing Two Cultures: American Indian/Alaska Native Medical Students' Perceptions of Academic Medicine Careers

How Personal Factors Influence Academic Behavior and GPA in African American STEM Students

Indigenous Student Perceptions on Cultural Relevance, Career Development, and Relationships in a Culturally Relevant Undergraduate STEM Program

Factors Influencing Student STEM Learning: Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy, 21st Century Skills, and Career Awareness

“I know what I need to learn”: The intersection of aspirational and navigational capitals for marginalized‐identity STEM students

The Role of Contextual Variables and Structural Diversity on College Students' Engineering Self-Efficacy

Do You Think I’m Worth It? The Self-Verifying Role of Parental Engagement in Career Adaptability and Career Persistence Among STEM Students

Purpose reflection benefits minoritized students' motivation and well-being in STEM

Understanding the Experiences of American Indian and Alaska Native Students Enrolled in Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Degree Programs

Gender, Racial-Ethnic, and Cohort Effects on STEM Interests: A Fourteen-Year Comparison

Socioeconomic Differences in North Carolina College Students’ Pathways Into STEM

Stability and changes in high school students' STEM career expectations: Variability based on STEM support and parent education.

Sociocultural and contextual determinants of science career goal at a community college and baccalaureate-granting institution