Abstract:It is well known that engineering is considered one of the more demanding fields of study to embark on. In mechanical engineering, courses such as thermodynamics, statics, mechanics of materials and others are perceived as challenging by students. Several factors impact students' ability to solve problems presented in these courses, including the ability to visualize the abstract concepts presented to them. Exams and homework assignments are among the standard tools used to assess students' performance and comprehension of course material. Student ability is determined by the quality of the written answers and by how well they document the process used to solve a problem. However, they provide only limited opportunities to reveal the viewing strategies used that may give additional insight into how students initially approach the given problem.In the present study, we use a within-subject experimental design to investigate the relationship between spatial visualization abilities of students and how students solve specific problems in the area of mechanics of materials. We employ a non-invasive eye-tracker (Tobii X-60) to record participants' eye movements during each problem solving task. According to the eye-mind hypothesis, people look at what they are thinking about. Participants were asked to solve several problems in the field of mechanics of materials, and the diagram of each problem was shown on a computer display. The data collected included: participants' fixation time, fixation counts, and scan paths of the critical areas of each diagram. The data were correlated with students' performance on Purdue Spatial Visualization Test and solid mechanics problems.The preliminary results show differences in the eye gaze data of high and low performance participants and provide insight into students' problem-solving strategies and difficulties, offering instructors new facts to adopt appropriate teaching methods for different students.

Looking with the (computer) mouse: How to unveil problem-solving strategies in matrix reasoning without eye-tracking

Strategy selection versus flexibility: Using eye-trackers to investigate strategy use during mental rotation.

Using a Deep Learning-Based Visual Computational Model to Identify Cognitive Strategies in Matrix Reasoning

Enriching Verbal Feedback from Usability Testing: Automatic Linking of Thinking-Aloud Recordings and Stimulus using Eye Tracking and Mouse Data

Understanding Students' Process for Solving Engineering Problems Using Eye Gaze Data

Understanding Humans' Strategies in Maze Solving

Visual-Imagery-Based Analogical Construction in Geometric Matrix Reasoning Task

An Eye Tracking Study of High- and Low-Performing Students in Solving Interactive and Analytical Problems.

Wandering minds, wandering mice: Computer mouse tracking as a method to detect mind wandering

I see an IC: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Study Human Problem-Solving Processes in Hardware Reverse Engineering

The Psychophysics of Human Three-Dimensional Active Visuospatial Problem-Solving

Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?

Seeing virtual while acting real: Visual display and strategy effects on the time and precision of eye-hand coordination

Eye-Tracking Piaget: Capturing the Emergence of Attentional Anchors in the Coordination of Proportional Motor Action

Multimodal Observation and Interpretation of Subjects Engaged in Problem Solving

On the Potential of Epistemic Actions for Self-Cueing: Multiple Orientations Can Prime 2D Shape Recognition and Use

Visualizing Complex Processes Using a Cognitive-Mapping Tool to Support the Learning of Clinical Reasoning

Eye and hand coarticulation during problem solving reveals hierarchically organized planning

An Experimental Study on Visual Search Factors of Information Features in a Task Monitoring Interface.

An Eye Movement Study in Unconventional Usage of Different Software Tools

Parallel Collaboration and Closed-Loop Control of a Cursor Using Multimodal Physiological Signals