Abstract:In the "classical" optimal portfolio literature,only market risk or cognitive risk associated with market is considered.In spite of their several major contributions to the theory of optimal asset selection only a handful of papers consider the case where one or more of the securities in the portfolio are subject to default risk.These authors use a diversification argument implying that jump risk do not show up in well-diversified portfolios of defaultable bonds and the impact of jump risk on portfolio management cannot be studied.In this paper we research a representative investor on how she optimally allocated her wealth among the following securities: a defaultable bond,a stock and a bank account.Because we assume that the investor invests a defaultable bond,there is jump risk in defaultable bond.Bring the jump risk into the investment portfolio is key innovation of this paper. We adopt the reduced-form approach to model the defaultable bond,and give the dynamics of defaultable bond.If the investor's utility is CRRA and stochastic control methods are adopted,we can obtain closed form solutions for the optimal strategies.The optimal strategy for the stock is constant irrespective of pre-default or post-default.The reason is that the stock has no correlation with the defaultable bond,which means there is no need to hedge for the default.Thus the optimal strategy for the stock is invariant to the default risk.The optimal strategy for the stock depends on the risk aversion,the market price of risk for the stock and the coefficient of the volatility of the stock return.Assume that the utility function is CRRA,the optimal strategy for the stock is independent of the investment horizon,so-called "myopic" effect. The optimal strategy of the defaultable bond is not a continuous function because of jump risk.The value of the defaultable bond after default is assumed to be zero.Thus,the post-default optimal strategy for defaultable bond is zero.The pre-default optimal strategy for defaultable bond is an increasing function of the credit spread.Holding other factors constant,the investor purchases more defaultable bonds when the credit spread is greater.The pre-default optimal strategy for defaultable bond is a decreasing function of the default intensity.The greater default intensity the higher possibility of default if other factors are constant,and the investor allocates smaller amount of wealth to the defaultable bond.The pre-default optimal strategy of the defaultable bond depends on the investment planning horizon.The investor allocates more when she has longer planning horizon.If the defaultable bond dos not default,the optimal strategy of the defaultable bond is not "myopic".

DOES DEFAULT RISK MATTER FOR INVESTORS IN REITS

Distress Risk and Stock Returns on Equity REITs

Default Risk, Shareholder Advantage, and Stock Returns

Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns Around the World

Default risk and stock returns: From a perspective of measurement errors

Idiosyncratic tail risk and expected stock returns: Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

Real Estate Risk, Corporate Investment and Financing Choice

Common risk factors and risk–return trade-off for REITs and treasuries

ESG components and equity returns: Evidence from real estate investment trusts

Optimal Portfolio with Default Risk

REIT idiosyncratic risk

Does Investing in ESG Pay Off? Evidence from REITs

Corporate environmental responsibility and default risk: Evidence from China

Equity Returns Following Changes in Default Risk: New Insights into the Informational Content of Credit Ratings

Short-Term Return Reversal: the Long and the Short of It

Short-selling and corporate default risk: Evidence from China

Revisiting the Relation between the Default Risk of Debt and the Earnings Response Coefficient

Local Beta: Has Local Real Estate Market Risk Been Priced in REIT Returns?

Systematic Default and Return Predictability in the Stock and Bond Markets

Rewarding a Long-Term Investment Strategy: REITs

The inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate social responsibility and default risk: The role of financing constraints