Abstract:Conflicts of interest often undermine conservation initiatives against biodiversity decline. Effective decision-making requires a deeper understanding of the positions, criteria, concerns, and perspectives of stakeholders. However, managing so many perspectives can be difficult, and if not done well, conflicts arise which make it difficult to achieve conservation goals. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that identifying areas of consensus is a good starting point to generate more effective debates and address complex issues. To do this, we investigate the diversity of perspectives regarding biodiversity conservation schemes among stakeholders in the studied ports of Antwerp and Rotterdam. Using Q-methodology, a semi-quantitative technique that enables us to systematically study the subjective views of stakeholders involved in a topic, we identified and organized a range of shared perspectives into three groups, known as factors. A total of 20 participants sorted 45 statements according to their perceptions and objectives, from -4 'most disagreeable' to 4 'most agreeable'. Then, respondents explained their rankings in a post-sorting interview. Next, the data was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative analysis was conducted in two parts: (i) Dividing respondents into groups based on similar perspectives and (ii) coupling distinguishing statements with one of the factors characteristic of that viewpoint. Finally, in a qualitative analysis, we used the distinguishing statements and insights from interviews to create narratives and titles for the three factors: (1) Ports are key for our economic wealth, hence port development should continue, (2) Nature first, and (3) Multi-actor governance. Our findings confirm consensuses in three areas: policy, land use, and mitigation tactics. Interestingly, all narratives unanimously agreed on the importance of regulating port development and land use changes via legislation and environmental impact assessments. However, they debated the rigidity of legislation and whether offsetting port expansion (and associated land and resource use claims) should take place locally or internationally. We also found that decision-making mostly followed a human-centered perspective, where economic values were more relevant than intrinsic ones. These insights can serve as a baseline for stakeholders to form coalitions around areas of consensus to depolarize debates and avoid decision-making gridlocks.

The balance of power in the governance of the global maritime safety: the role of classification societies from a habitus perspective

Toward a behavioral approach of international shipping: a study of the inter-organisational dynamics of maritime safety

The Role of Stakeholder Participation and Sustainability Integration in Maritime Transport: A Structure-Conduct-performance Analysis

An Economic Approach to Maritime Risk Management and Safety Regulation

How Can the Maritime Industry Meet Sustainable Development Goals? an Analysis of Sustainability Reports from the Social Entrepreneurship Perspective

Shipping Industry's Sustainability Communications to Public in Social Media: A Longitudinal Analysis

Maritime Safety Analysis in Retrospect

Ocean governance and maritime security in a placeful environment: The case of the European Union

Quantification of influence and interest at IMO in Maritime Safety and Human Element matters

1 The IMO and Global Ocean Governance: Past, Present, and Future

Governance of inter-organizational systems: a longitudinal case study of Rotterdam’s Port Community System

Critical Perspectives on the New Situation of Global Ocean Governance

Marine citizenship: The right to participate in the transformation of the human-ocean relationship for sustainability

A critical examination of safety culture in the superyacht industry

The IMLI Treatise On Global Ocean Governance

Diversity of perspectives in biodiversity conservation: A case study of port land use in Antwerp and Rotterdam

A new perspective on the work of boundary organisations: Bridging knowledge between marine conservation actors in Pacific Small Island Developing States

The regionalization of maritime governance: Towards a polycentric governance system for sustainable shipping in the European Union

Preventing shipping accidents: Past, present, and future of waterway risk management with Baltic Sea focus

Building sustainable performance in the maritime industry via digital resources and innovation

Additional Risk Classifications and Indicators Using Multivariate Techniques