Challenging the relationship of grip strength with cognitive status in older adults

Andrew Hooyman,Michael Malek‐Ahmadi,Elizabeth B. Fauth,Sydney Y. Schaefer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5441
2020-10-24
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Grip strength is a widely‐used motor assessment in aging research, and has repeatedly been shown to be associated with cognition. It has been proposed that grip strength could enhance cognitive screening in experimental or clinical research, but this paper uses multiple data‐driven approaches to caution against this interpretation. Further, we introduce an alternative motor assessment, comparable to grip dynamometry, but has a more robust relationship with cognition among older adults.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Design</h3><p>Associations between grip strength and cognition (measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) were analyzed cross‐sectionally using multivariate regression in two datasets: 1) The Irish LongituDinal Study on Aging (TILDA; <i>N</i>=5,980, community‐dwelling adults ages 49‐80) and 2) an experimental dataset (<i>N</i>=250, community‐dwelling adults aged 39‐98). Additional statistical simulations on TILDA tested how ceiling effects or skewness in these variables influenced these associations for quality control. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Grip strength was significantly but weakly associated with cognition, consistent with previous studies. Simulations revealed this was not due to skewness/ceiling effects. Conversely, a new alternative motor assessment (functional reaching) had a stronger, more robust, and more sensitive relationship with cognition compared to grip strength.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Grip strength should be cautiously interpreted as being associated with cognition. However, functional reaching may have a stronger and clinically useful relationship with cognition.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>
psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?