Abstract:Quantum Annealing (QA) relies on mixing two Hamiltonian terms, a simple driver and a complex problem Hamiltonian, in a linear combination. The time-dependent schedule for this mixing is often taken to be linear in time: improving on this linear choice is known to be essential and has proven to be difficult. Here, we present different techniques for improving on the linear-schedule QA along two directions, conceptually distinct but leading to similar outcomes: 1) the first approach consists of constructing a Trotter-digitized QA (dQA) with schedules parameterized in terms of Fourier modes or Chebyshev polynomials, inspired by the Chopped Random Basis algorithm (CRAB) for optimal control in continuous time; 2) the second approach is technically a Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose solutions are found iteratively using linear interpolation or expansion in Fourier modes. Both approaches emphasize finding smooth optimal schedule parameters, ultimately leading to hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms of the alternating Hamiltonian Ansatz type. We apply these techniques to MaxCut problems on weighted 3-regular graphs with N = 14 sites, focusing on hard instances that exhibit a small spectral gap, for which a standard linear-schedule QA performs poorly. We characterize the physics behind the optimal protocols for both the dQA and QAOA approaches, discovering shortcuts to adiabaticity-like dynamics. Furthermore, we study the transferability of such smooth solutions among hard instances of MaxCut at different circuit depths. Finally, we show that the smoothness pattern of these protocols obtained in a digital setting enables us to adapt them to continuous-time evolution, contrarily to generic non-smooth solutions. This procedure results in an optimized quantum annealing schedule that is implementable on analog devices.

Optimizing quantum annealing schedules with Monte Carlo tree search enhanced with neural networks

Deep learning optimal quantum annealing schedules for random Ising models

Optimizing Schedules for Quantum Annealing

Performance of quantum annealing inspired algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems

Quantum Annealing Formulation for Binary Neural Networks

Neural Networks for Programming Quantum Annealers

A Monte Carlo Tree Search approach to QAOA: finding a needle in the haystack

Optimization by quantum annealing: lessons from hard satisfiability problems

Boosting the performance of quantum annealers using machine learning

On the emerging potential of quantum annealing hardware for combinatorial optimization

Multivariable Optimization: Quantum Annealing & Computation

Statistical Analysis of Quantum Annealing

Beyond Quantum Annealing: Optimal control solutions to MaxCut problems

Optimizing the Optimizer: Decomposition Techniques for Quantum Annealing

Using machine learning for quantum annealing accuracy prediction

Comparative analysis of diverse methodologies for portfolio optimization leveraging quantum annealing techniques

Completely quantum neural networks

Hybrid Quantum Annealing via Molecular Dynamics

Benchmarking Metaheuristic-Integrated QAOA against Quantum Annealing

Hybrid Optimization Method Using Simulated-Annealing-Based Ising Machine and Quantum Annealer

Recognizing Good Variational Quantum Circuits with Monte Carlo Tree Search