Spontaneous Mouse Behavior in Presence of Dissonance and Acoustic Roughness

Olivier Postal,Typhaine Dupont,Warren Bakay,Noémi Dominique,Christine Petit,Nicolas Michalski,Boris Gourévitch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.588834
IF: 3.617
2020-10-08
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Abstract:According to a novel hypothesis (Arnal et al., 2015, Current Biology 25:2051–2056), auditory roughness, or temporal envelope modulations between 30 and 150 Hz, are present in both natural and artificial human alarm signals, which boosts the detection of these alarms in various tasks. These results also shed new light on the unpleasantness of dissonant sounds to humans, which builds upon the high level of roughness present in such sounds. However, it is not clear whether this hypothesis also applies to other species, such as rodents. In particular, whether consonant/dissonant chords, and particularly whether auditory roughness, can trigger unpleasant sensations in mice remains unknown. Using an autonomous behavioral system, which allows the monitoring of mouse behavior over a period of weeks, we observed that C57Bl6J mice did not show any preference for consonant chords. In addition, we found that mice showed a preference for rough sounds over sounds having amplitude modulations in their temporal envelope outside the "rough" range. These results suggest that some emotional features carried by the acoustic temporal envelope are likely to be species-specific.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether the perception and response of rodents (such as mice) to dissonant sounds and acoustic roughness are similar to those of humans. Specifically, the researchers wanted to understand: 1. **Preference of mice for consonant and dissonant tones**: According to human studies, dissonant tones usually cause discomfort, while consonant tones are more pleasant. The researchers wanted to verify whether this preference also exists in mice. 2. **Effect of acoustic roughness on mouse behavior**: Acoustic roughness refers to the amplitude modulation of the time envelope of sound between 30 and 150 Hz, which usually causes an unpleasant feeling in humans. The researchers hoped to understand whether this roughness would also cause an unpleasant reaction in mice. To answer these questions, the researchers designed a series of experiments, using an automated behavior monitoring system (Audiobox), to observe the behavioral changes of mice under different sound stimuli, including consonant and dissonant tones, and amplitude - modulated sounds with different modulation frequencies. Through these experiments, the researchers hoped to reveal the sensitivity and preference of mice to these sounds, thereby further understanding the emotional effects of acoustic features in different species. ### Main findings 1. **Mice have no obvious preference for consonant and dissonant tones**: The study found that mice did not show obvious preference or aversion between consonant and dissonant tones. 2. **Sensitivity of mice to acoustic roughness**: Mice showed longer visit time and licking time for sounds with modulation frequencies in the range of 25 - 70 Hz, indicating that these frequencies of sounds may be more pleasant for mice. Conversely, modulated sounds at low frequencies (2 - 5 Hz) and high frequencies (140 Hz) resulted in shorter visit time and licking time and may be regarded as unpleasant sounds by mice. ### Discussion The research results show that the response of mice to acoustic roughness is different from that of humans. Humans usually consider rough sounds (especially those with a modulation frequency of about 70 Hz) to be unpleasant, while mice seem to show a preference for these sounds. This finding suggests that the emotional effects of acoustic features may be species - specific, and further research on the differences between different species is required. ### Conclusion This study not only enhances our understanding of the auditory perception of mice, but also provides important data support for cross - species comparison, which is helpful for future research in the field of auditory neuroscience.