Borrelia burgdorferi in primary cutaneous lymphomas: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Antonio Travaglino,Silvia Varricchio,Mirella Pace,Daniela Russo,Marco Picardi,Antonello Baldo,Stefania Staibano,Massimo Mascolo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.14289
2020-10-08
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>The association between <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> and primary cutaneous lymphoma is still unclear. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to define the association of <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> with primary cutaneous lymphoma and its different entities. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Electronic databases were searched for all studies that assessed the presence of <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> DNA in specimens of primary cutaneous lymphoma. The association between <i>Borrelia</i> and primary cutaneous lymphomas was assessed with an odds ratio (significant p &lt; 0.05); cutaneous specimens with no lymphoproliferative disorders were used as controls. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the prevalence of <i>Borrelia</i> infection in different lymphoma entities. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Ten studies with 506 primary cutaneous lymphomas and 201 controls were included. The prevalence of <i>Borrelia</i> DNA positivity was highly heterogeneous among studies from different regions. <i>Borrelia</i> DNA positivity was significantly associated with primary cutaneous lymphomas (odds ratio = 10.88; p &lt; 0.00001). The prevalence of <i>Borrelia</i> DNA positivity was similar among different entities (marginal zone: 7.3 %; follicular: 8.1 %; diffuse large B‐cell: 7.5 %; mycosis fungoides: 8 %). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p><i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> is significantly associated with primary cutaneous lymphomas, with no differences among the several lymphoma entities (both B‐cell and T‐cell), but with strong geographical differences. Molecular testing for <i>Borrelia</i> would be justified in patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma from endemic areas. </p></section>
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?