Abstract:BackgroundMany factors can affect a surgeon’s performance in the operating room; these may include surgeon comfort, ergonomics of tool handle design, and fatigue. A laparoscopic tool handle designed with ergonomic considerations (pistol grip) was tested against a current market tool with a traditional pinch grip handle. The goal of this study is to quantify the impact ergonomic design considerations which have on surgeon performance. We hypothesized that there will be measurable differences between the efficiency while performing FLS surgical trainer tasks when using both tool handle designs in three categories: time to completion, technical skill, and subjective user ratings.MethodsThe pistol grip incorporates an ergonomic interface intended to reduce contact stress points on the hand and fingers, promote a more neutral operating wrist posture, and reduce hand tremor and fatigue. The traditional pinch grip is a laparoscopic tool developed by Stryker Inc. widely used during minimal invasive surgery. Twenty-three (13 M, 10 F) participants with no existing upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders or experience performing laparoscopic procedures were selected to perform in this study. During a training session prior to testing, participants performed practice trials in a SAGES FLS trainer with both tools. During data collection, participants performed three evaluation tasks using both handle designs (order was randomized, and each trial completed three times). The tasks consisted of FLS peg transfer, cutting, and suturing tasks.ResultsFeedback from test participants indicated that they significantly preferred the ergonomic pistol grip in every category (p < 0.05); most notably, participants experienced greater degrees of discomfort in their hands after using the pinch grip tool. Furthermore, participants completed cutting and peg transfer tasks in a shorter time duration (p < 0.05) with the pistol grip than with the pinch grip design; there was no significant difference between completion times for the suturing task. Finally, there was no significant interaction between tool type and errors made during trials.ConclusionsThere was a significant preference for as well as lower pain experienced during use of the pistol grip tool as seen from the survey feedback. Both evaluation tasks (cutting and peg transfer) were also completed significantly faster with the pistol grip tool. Finally, due to the high degree of variability in the error data, it was not possible to draw any meaningful conclusions about the effect of tool design on the number or degree of errors made.

Hand grasping and finger flexion during Lower Paleolithic stone tool ergonomic exploration

"How Handy was early hominin 'know-how'?" An experimental approach exploring efficient early stone tool use

The Influence of Tool Morphology on Visual Attention During the Interaction with Lower Palaeolithic Stone Tools

Biocultural evidence of precise manual activities in an Early Holocene individual of the high-altitude Peruvian Andes

Humanlike manual activities in Australopithecus

A new thumb phalanx from Moula Guercy (France): description and considerations of Neandertal hand use

Visual Attention and Cognitive Archaeology: An Eye-Tracking Study of Palaeolithic Stone Tools

Design and development of a sensorized hammerstone for accurate force measurement in stone knapping experiments

Ochre-based compound adhesives at the Mousterian type-site document complex cognition and high investment

The use of bones as tools in Late Lower Paleolithic of Central Italy

Stone toolmaking energy expenditure differs between novice and expert toolmakers

Comparative Study of the Use of Different Sizes of an Ergonomic Instrument Handle for Laparoscopic Surgery

The Acheulean niche: climate and ecology predict handaxe production in Europe

Tool skill impacts the archaeological evidence across technological primates

Effect of Handle Design and Target Location on Wrist Posture during Aiming with a Laparoscopic Tool

First identification of a Neanderthal bone spear point through an interdisciplinary analysis at Abric Romaní (NE Iberian Peninsula)

The contribution of stone tool residues in reconstructing Late Pleistocene hominin stone tool behaviour at Grotta di Fumane, Italy

The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency

Comparative anatomy of the Sapajus sp. (bearded capuchin) hand with comments on tool use in a parallel evolution with the hominid pathway

Why did hunting weapon design change at Abri Pataud? Lithic use-wear data on armature use and hafting around 24,000-22,000 BP

Uncovering the adult morphology of the forearm bones from the Sima de los Huesos Site in Atapuerca (Spain), with comments on biomechanical features