Abstract:This study evaluates the performance and robustness of 22 established and newly proposed glare prediction metrics. Experimental datasets of daylight-dominated workplaces in office-like test rooms were collected from studies by seven research groups in six different locations (Argentina, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Japan and the United States). The variability in experimental setups, locations and research teams allowed reliable evaluation of the performance and robustness of glare metrics for daylight-dominated workplaces. Independent statistical methods were applied to individual datasets and also to one combined dataset to evaluate the performance and robustness of the 22 glare metrics. As performance and robustness are not established in literature, we defined performance as: (1) the ability of the metric value to describe the glare scale (evaluated by Spearman rank correlation), and (2) the ability of the metric to distinguish between disturbing and non-disturbing situations (evaluated by diagnostic receiver operating characteristic curve analysis tests). Furthermore, we defined robustness as the ability of a metric to deliver meaningful results when applied to different datasets and to fail as few as possible statistical tests. Average Spearman rank correlation coefficients in the range of 0.55–0.60 as well as average prediction rates to distinguish between disturbing and non-disturbing glare of 70–75% for several of the metrics indicate their reliability. The results also show that metrics considering the saturation effect as a main input in their equation perform better and are more robust in daylight-dominated workplaces than purely contrast-based metrics or purely empirical metrics. In this study, the daylight glare probability (DGP) delivered the highest performance amongst the tested metrics and was also found to be the most robust. Future research should aim to optimise the terms of glare equations which combine contrast and saturation effects, such as DGP, PGSV or UGR exp , to achieve metrics that also perform reliably in dimmer lighting conditions than the ones explored in this study.

GLANCE (GLare ANnual Classes Evaluation): An approach for a simplified spatial glare evaluation

A Simplified Approach for the Annual and Spatial Evaluation of the Comfort Classes of Daylight Glare Using Vertical Illuminances

Discomfort glare prediction by using Unified Glare Rating

Development of Daylight Glare Analysis Method Using an Integrated Parametric Modelling Approach: A Comparative Study of Glare Evaluation Standards

The Glare Evaluation Method Using Digital Camera for Civil Airplane Flight Deck

Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor

Variable set points of glare control strategy for side-lit spaces: Daylight glare tolerance by time of day

In-situ evaluation of high-performance glazing based on illuminance and glare

Spatial–Spectral Evidence of Glare Influence on Hyperspectral Acquisitions

Glare analysis of an integral daylighting and lighting control strategy for offices

Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics

A study of daylight glare evaluation with prism daylighting redirecting fenestrations

The Unified semantic Glare scale for GR and UGR indexes

Exploring the Applicability of the Unified Glare Rating for an Outdoor Non-Uniform Residential Luminaire

Assessing Glare. Part 1: Comparing Uniform and Non-Uniform Led Luminaires

A preliminary study of an evaluation method for discomfort glare due to light trespass

Contrast-based evaluation of the reflected daylight glare on the blackboard in a classroom with complex fenestration systems

A New Test for the Evaluation of Disability Glare

A practical approach to glare assessment for train cabs

Calculation of the Unified Glare Rating based on luminance maps for uniform and non-uniform light sources