Characterization of compound A, a novel lincomycin derivative active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Yoko Hirai,Kazunori Maebashi,Keiko Yamada,Yoshinari Wakiyama,Ko Kumura,Eijiro Umemura,Keiichi Ajito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-00375-1
2020-10-15
The Journal of Antibiotics
Abstract:Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is one of causative bacteria for hospital- and community-acquired infections. In order to overcome MRSA infection, we synthesized compound A, a lincomycin derivative, and evaluated the biological properties. The MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> values of compound A against MRSA clinical isolates, which were susceptible to clindamycin, from infected skin in Japan were 0.12 and 0.25 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, and those against hospital-acquired MRSA with clindamycin resistance were 1.0 and 2.0 μg ml<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Linezolid non-susceptible MRSA selected in the laboratory had mutations in the 23S rRNA gene and exhibited cross-resistance to compound A. MRSA non-susceptible to compound A selected in laboratory was not cross-resistant to linezolid, implying that the binding site to 23S rRNA partly overlaps with clindamycin and linezolid. The in vivo efficacies of compound A against mouse skin abscess model infected with clindamycin-susceptible and -resistant MRSA were superior to those of clindamycin and linezolid, respectively. The well-known linezolid-induced myelosuppression is caused by its inhibitory effect on mitochondrial function, but inhibition was weaker for compound A than that of linezolid. In short, compound A has broader anti-MRSA activities than clindamycin and linezolid due to additional binding site, and demonstrated preferable safety profile as a potential anti-MRSA drug.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?