Abstract:To help understand modern financial accounting theory ('FAT') and its role in the development of finance and business, I consider two current mainstream histories of its development and offer a third alternative. The standard setters’ version is that increasingly FAT is rationally derived from a basically coherent conceptual framework, currently focused on 'comprehensive income' as measured by 'changes in assets and liabilities', in turn preferably measured at fair values. However, examination here of several recent FASB/IASB standards and exposure drafts shows that instead they unavoidably bear the marks of the history of a variety of now embedded practices that have shaped thinking about, and vested interests in, what is 'good accounting'. By contrast, some recent academic versions of history focus on how 'conservative', historical-cost based accounting principles have rationally evolved to provide an anchor on which to base appraisal of firms’ and managers’ performance, prospects and risks, and supply the kind of information that investors and other parties in the capital markets need to help overcome the information asymmetry between them and corporate managers. After analyzing the limitations of this second type of history, I argue that even a brief genealogical examination of the conditions of possibility that have led to the growth and changes in accounting and auditing practices and discourses, and in the power-knowledge relations that they have engendered at different stages over the millennia of recorded history, suggests that their power has always been more that of 'institutional rationalized myth'. The twin rational myths of the objectivity of accounting and of auditing together provide the structure that offers the comfort necessary to enable the various agents in the modern, increasingly global, economy to undertake and finance the risks of acting 'at a distance' and across time. This modern, grammatocentric accountability increasingly extends throughout the institutions that coordinate modern societies, in the rising East as well as in the established West. Exploring how much of FAT is rational and reflects some objective 'economic reality' and how much is myth and is subjectively, socially constructed; and, again, how much might be improved and how much is intractable, are the major questions now for accounting, auditing and finance policy-making and research. This requires further detailed comparative international historical understanding of how accounting and auditing have variously operated, within businesses and other organizations and in shaping markets, across different countries and cultures.

Financial Accounting and Auditing Experiments in the Journal of Accounting Research: Historical Background and Recent Advances

Evolution of Auditing Experimental Research and Contemporary Topics in Auditing

Financial Accounting Research, Practice, and Financial Accountability

Replication of Audit and Financial Accounting Research: We Do More than We Think

The evolution of internal audit research: a bibliometric analysis of published documents (1926–2016)

Understanding the changes in accounting thought

Environmental Accounting in the European Accounting Review: A Reflection

Wave after wave: unboxing 40 years of auditing ethics research

Research Initiatives in Accounting Education: Improving Learning Effectiveness

Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Accounting Conservatism Research: Past Trends and Future Research Suggestions

Theories of Accounting: Evolution & Developments, Income-Determination and Diversities in Use

Examination and Implications of Experimental Research on Investor Perceptions

A Literature Review of Technology‐Related Research in Accounting Education: 2010–2020†

Recent Research on the Identification, Assessment, and Response to Fraud Risks: Implications for Audit Practice and Topics for Future Research

Shedding light on alternative interdisciplinary accounting research through journal editors’ perspectives and an analysis of recent publications

Detecting and Predicting Accounting Irregularities: A Comparison of Commercial and Academic Risk Measures

Constructing a Research Field: A Reflection on the History of Social and Environmental Accounting

Past, present, and future of carbon accounting: Insights from scholarly research

Rethinking the accounting ethics education research in the post- COVID-19 context

Fair Value vs Conservatism? Aspects of the History of Accounting, Auditing, Business and Finance from Ancient Mesopotamia to Modern China

Big data techniques in auditing research and practice: Current trends and future opportunities