Abstract:admirable that they don’t use the book’s pages as a teleological promotion of PB as the answer to society’s problems. In fact, the authors make a significant and transparent effort to hold themselves at arm’s length from their object of analysis. Participation is not necessarily evidence of democracy. What matters for democracy is what happens after the participation has occurred. It is fundamentally a pragmatist challenge to the literature (and one can sense the presence of John Dewey and others behind the writing): What appreciable difference does participation make in the lives (and actions) of participants, or of anyone else, for that matter? In some cases, the authors tell us, the answer is ‘‘not very much.’’ So, for those who care about democracy, there is still significant work to be done in research and in practice. This leads me to a minor disappointment with the book. In short, I wanted more details on how to connect participation to governance. What should we do? What should we be on the lookout for? How can we do it? This is a compliment, as I found myself convinced in the writing that the authors really know their stuff. Who better to muse on this (and at least spend a page or two more than they allotted in the conclusion) envisioning a real utopia or two? Perhaps this will be their next project. I certainly hope so. This is a unique and important piece of scholarship. The book certainly left me feeling invigorated and motivated to think differently about my own work on deliberation and democracy. I plan to use this book in my courses on Political Sociology and Democracy at the undergraduate level, and I will ask all of my graduate students working in this area to read it. It will become a ‘‘must-read’’ in the field. I imagine the book will be of interest to sociologists, political scientists, and communication scholars, as well as anyone who wants to understand how democracy works. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing, by Derek Beach and Rasmus Brun Pedersen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016. 388 pp. $39.95 paper. ISBN: 9780472053223.

Democracy without Shortcuts: Introduction to the Special Issue

Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing

Deliberation and Policy-Making: Three Ways to Think About Minipublics’ Consequences

Deliberative Mini-publics as a Response to the Crisis of Representative Democracy: First Attempts at Institutionalization in European Cities

What roles can democracy labs play in co-creating democratic innovations for sustainability?

Mini-publics, student participation, and universities’ deliberative capacity

Policy and Science: Options for Democratisation in European Countries

Referendums and Direct Democracy

Democracy Models and Civic Technologies: Tensions, Trilemmas, and Trade-offs

Introduction to the special issue: Justice and solidarity in Europe

Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy

Crisis of Democracy, Social Media and the Digital Age: The Narrative of Specialists from Spain, Mexico and Peru.

Citizens at the forefront of the constitutional debate: Participation determinants and emergent content in Chile

Participatory Democracy and Sustainability. Deliberative Democratic Innovation and Its Acceptance by Citizens and German Local Councilors

Unleashing the Transformative Power of Deliberation With Contextual Citizens

Consenting Participation? How Demands for Citizen Participation and Expert-Led Decision-Making Are Reconciled in Local Democracy

Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy

Forms of new democracy

Asserting disadvantaged communities' deliberative agency in a media-saturated society

A twenty-first century Citizens’ POLIS: introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making

Foundations of e-Democracy