Abstract:Abstract SMM may have an indolent course and remain stable for years; however, some patients evolve to MM requiring treatment within two years or less. To timely recognize these patients, three biomarkers (FLCR>100, ≥1 osteolysis and ≥60% plasma cell bone marrow infiltration) were recently established to discriminate asymptomatic MM patients at increased risk of rapid evolution and therefore, patients displaying the aforementioned biomarkers are considered symptomatic and receive immediate treatment. Despite the usage of the new IMWG definition criteria, there are still patients evolving rapidly and the notion of High risk SMM remains subjective among scientific groups. We herein studied wherever immunoglobulin (Ig) Heavy/Light Chain (HLC) measurements with the "Hevylite" assay that measures separately HLC-IgA, -G, -M-kappa or lambda, could add prognostic information on SMM evolution, with special attention to the significance of polyclonal Ig suppression. This method allows exact quantification of the amount of pure monoclonal fraction but also the degree of suppression of uninvolved polyclonal Igs. Patients and Methods: We studied 79 SMM patients of whom 30 were men and 49 women, with median age 65 (31-84) Ig type was IgG in 64 patients (81%) and IgA in the rest (19%). None of the patients had a free light chain ratio (FLCR) of more than 100, bone disease or more than 60% plasma cell bone marrow infiltration, in accordance to the last IMWG definition criteria. Patients were regularly followed (each 3 months) since SMM diagnosis and for a long period of time (median 98 months) during which 15 patients evolved to MM. "HevyLite" assay measurements were performed by nephelometry according to the manufacturer's instructions in frozen sera sample drawn at the time of diagnosis. We then calculated in all patients the ratio of involved/uninvolved Ig (HLCR); we also scored on a 5 points scale the eventuality of uninvolved Ig kappa or lambda below normal limits, that are, according to the manufacturer's testing on healthy individuals, 3608, 2023, 300, 312, 267, and 185 mg/L for IgG-kappa, IgG-lambda, IgA-kappa, IgA-lambda, IgM-kappa and IgM-lambda respectively. Results' relationship with SMM evolution were analyzed by standard methods using the SPSS v22.0. software and p values below 0,05 were considered statistically significant. Survival curved were drawn according to Kaplan-Mayer method. Results: Monoclonal Ig type was IgG-kappa, IgG-lambda, IgA-kappa, IgA-lambda in 61%, 19%, 11% and 9% of SMM patients respectively. Uninvolved IgG-kappa, IgG-lambda, IgA-kappa, IgA-lambda, IgM-kappa, IgM-lambda ranged from 625 to 14300 mg/L, 495 to 12700 mg/L , 214 to 2930 mg/L, 38 to 2580 mg/L, 19 to 1300 mg/L, 51 to 950 mg/L respectively. Median HLCR was 7 (range 0,24-707). Patients with HLCR above median tended to evolve faster than the others (p=0,1-not reaching statistical significance). Thirty-five patients had no one uninvolved Ig class depressed (score 0), 28 had 1, 9 had 2, 5 had 3 and 2 had 4; No score 5 was observed. Time to evolution strongly correlated to high score uninvolved Ig suppression (p< 0,00001). A simplified score separating 3 groups, the first with 0 Ig suppression, the 2nd with 1 or 2 and the 3rd with 3 or 4 proved to be equally potent in separating 3 risk-groups of SMM patients at risk of evolution to myeloma (p< 0,00001) and the great majority of the patients in the 3rd group evolved within two years (figure). In conclusion, the presence of decreased uninvolved Ig levels as determined by "Hevylite" constitutes a powerful prognostic marker of SMM evolution to MM. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)

Mode of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma: a study of 406 patients

Smoldering multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms

The genomic profiling of high-risk smoldering myeloma patients treated with an intensive strategy unveils potential markers of resistance and progression

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Observation Versus Control Versus Cure

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management

Three‐dimensional telomere profiling predicts risk of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma

Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with high-risk and non-high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma using the Flatiron Health database

High-risk disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: beyond the R-ISS and IMWG definitions

Changing paradigms in diagnosis and treatment of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)

From MGUS to multiple myeloma: Unraveling the unknown of precursor states

Evaluating early intervention in smoldering myeloma clinical trials: a systematic review

Diagnosis and management of smoldering multiple myeloma: the razor's edge between clonality and cancer

How to Identify and Manage High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma : Taking the narrow over the wide path?

Genomic Classification and Individualized Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma

Immune biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma

Longitudinal assessment of established risk stratification models in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

The Difficulty in Defining the True High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma

Uninvolved Immunoglobulin Suppression Determined By "Hevylite" ASSAY. Strongly Predicts Evolution of Smoldering Myeloma (SMM) to Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma (MM)