Abstract:The Aegean Sea as a common sea region for Greece and Turkey is not only an important source of aquatic biological and energy resources, but also a water area where both countries have their own interests in its economic development and use. Traditionally, this sea area, most of which is a high sea in terms of rules and provisions of the modern international maritime law, has been used by both states on a parity basis, and other extra-regional countries have had equal rights with them here. However, the desire of Greece and Turkey to extend their zones of sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction over maritime zones, seabed and subsoil has given rise to new maritime disputes. It is no coincidence that the problem of delimiting the continental shelf, i. e. the underwater margin of the continent where coastal countries are vested with rights to explore and exploit its resources, has accompanied the Turkish-Greek negotiations for decades. Greece has even initiated legal proceedings before the International Court of Justice on the issue, but for various reasons the Court found that it had no jurisdiction to hear the case. To date, the positions of the parties on this issue have not changed; they are directly opposite and mutually exclusive. This and other circumstances, as well as the fact that Turkey is not a party to either the 1958 Geneva Conventions or the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, severely limits the possibility of a new trial. Moreover, the legal positivism of the Greek position on the entire spectrum of Aegean Sea problems, i. e. an appeal solely to the applicable rules and provisions of international law of the sea, not only fails to satisfy Turkey but also has negative consequences for other countries. First of all, this concerns issues related to the freedom of navigation. Greece’s claim to extend the outer limits of its territorial sea from 6 to 12 nautical miles around the huge number of Greek islands in the Aegean Sea would inevitably lead to a significant reduction of the high sea. Although at a minimum the right of innocent passage and at a maximum the more liberal rule of the law of the sea – the right of transit passage – will apply, the legal regime for these maritime areas will be fundamentally different and more heavily regulated. The passage of merchant ships and warships, as well as the overflight of military aircraft, including those of any foreign country, also of the U.S. and Russian Federation, will not be as free as on the high seas. All of these issues are dealt with in this (second) part of the paper. Acknowledgements. The article was prepared within the project “Post-Crisis World Order: Challenges and Technologies, Competition and Cooperation” supported by the grant from Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation program for research projects in priority areas of scientific and technological development (Agreement No 075-15-2020-783).

Turkey’s Quest for Influence in the Mediterranean in the Post-Arab Uprisings Era

Turkey and the Major Powers in the Eastern Mediterranean Crisis from the 2010s to the 2020s

TURKEY'S LIBYA APPROACH AND IRINI OPERATION ON THE GREECE ISSUE

Turkey as a Mediator in the Middle East: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis

Turkey's quest to become a regional energy hub: Challenges and opportunities

Turkey and Israel: Changing Patterns of Alliances in the Eastern Mediterranean

Global energy market dynamics and natural gas development in the Eastern Mediterranean region

Greek-Turkish Relations: Current Status and Opportunities to Reduce Confrontational Potential

Erdogan’s priority is returning Turkey to Islamic ways

Turkish northern Caucasus foreign policy impact Russian national security

"Aegean Dispute" in Turkish-Greek Relations

Turkey’s approach to proxy war in the Middle East and North Africa

The Aegean Sea of Contradictions (Part II)

The Risks of Hydro-Hegemony: Turkey’s Environmental Policies and Shared Water Resources in the South Caucasus

TURKEY AND GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE ROLE OF TURKISH PUBLIC DIPLOMACY IN FOREIGN POLICY

Introduction: Turkey, Russia, and Iran—New Dominant Powers in the Middle East?

The Turkish factor in Greek-Russian relations in the 2010s

Turkey’s Policy toward Iraq since the First Gulf War a Power Balancing Approach

The Aegean dispute and its implications for the U.S. policy

European Union interaction with South-Eastern Mediterranean: From “Ring of friends” to “Ring of fire”

Turkey at the crossroads: a study of geopolitics and tourism re-alignment