Abstract:This paper investigates the role of homophily and focus constraint in shaping collaborative scientific research. First, homophily structures collaboration when scientists adhere to a norm of exclusivity in selecting similar partners at a higher rate than dissimilar ones. Two dimensions on which similarity between scientists can be assessed are their research specialties and status positions. Second, focus constraint shapes collaboration when connections among scientists depend on opportunities for social contact. Constraint comes in two forms, depending on whether it originates in institutional or geographic space. Institutional constraint refers to the tendency of scientists to select collaborators within rather than across institutional boundaries. Geographic constraint is the principle that, when collaborations span different institutions, they are more likely to involve scientists that are geographically co-located than dispersed. To study homophily and focus constraint, the paper will argue in favour of an idea of collaboration that moves beyond formal co-authorship to include also other forms of informal intellectual exchange that do not translate into the publication of joint work. A community-detection algorithm is applied to the co-authorship network of the scientists that submitted in Business and Management in the 2001 UK RAE. While results only partially support research-based homophily, they indicate that scientists use status positions for discriminating between potential partners by selecting collaborators from institutions with a rating similar to their own. Strong support is provided in favour of institutional and geographic constraints. Scientists tend to forge intra-institutional collaborations; yet, when they seek collaborators outside their own institutions, they tend to select those who are in geographic proximity.

Network representations of diversity in scientific teams

A Model of Collaboration Network Formation with Heterogenous Skills

Network Structure shapes the Impact of Diversity in Collective Learning

Research on Adverse Impact of Team Diversity on Knowledge-sharing

How networks shape diversity for better or worse

Diversity of Social Ties in Scientific Collaboration Networks

Knowledge and Social Relatedness Shape Research Portfolio Diversification

Untangling the Network Effects of Productivity and Prominence among Scientists

Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes

When Does Educational Level Diversity Foster Team Creativity? Exploring the Moderating Roles of Task and Personnel Variability

Diversity of Expertise is Key to Scientific Impact: a Large-Scale Analysis in the Field of Computer Science

Effects of Network Connectivity and Functional Diversity Distribution on Human Collective Ideation

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration

Gender and collaboration patterns in a temporal scientific authorship network

Investigating Scientific Collaboration Through the Sequence of Authors in the Publication Bylines and the Diversity of Collaborators.

The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration

On Measuring the Diversity of Organizational Networks

Informational Diversity and Affinity Bias in Team Growth Dynamics