Abstract:Numerous recent studies show that sharing politician or bureaucrat performance information with voters seldom succeeds at generating bottom-up pressure. One explanation is that local politics in developing democracies are typically mediated through local "development broker" elites, who often lack critical procedural information. Does supplying local leaders with information about decentralized political processes allow them to participate more effectively, generate accountability pressure, and improve public goods provision? A randomized field experiment in Peru demonstrates that information can indeed provoke attitudinal and behavioral change among village elites regarding participation, government performance and protest, but often in unanticipated ways. The study finds that training workshops in fact reduce participation in local participatory budgeting processes, reduce satisfaction with mayors, and increase support for protest and recall elections. Aggregate behavioral measures find a reduction in participatory budgeting attendance, but no changes in the probability of protest or recall initiation. Although village leaders are frustrated with mayoral performance, they struggle to generate collective action and thus have to settle for withdrawing from processes they can leave unilaterally. A test of mechanisms indicates this is not driven primarily by rent-seeking. There are no overall effects on district government performance in the following year. The evidence indicates that information can prompt local leaders to make political moves, but the high costs of collection action makes it difficult to produce meaningful change in politician behavior.

Citizen Participation: Linking Government Efforts, Actual Participation, and Trust in Local Politicians

Making Citizen Participation Work: The Challenging Search for New Forms of Local Democracy in The Netherlands

Trust in Local Government: Service Satisfaction, Culture, and Demography

Political participation and municipal population size: A meta-study

The voice of distrust? The relationship between political trust, online political participation and voting

Types of Public Participation and Their Effect on Satisfaction with Local Public Services in China

Decentralization and Citizens’ Participation in Local Governance: Does Trust and Transparency Matter? – An Empirical Study

Citizen Participation,Performance Evaluation & Citizen Trust in Government

Who participates and why: building a process model of citizen participation

Do Social Media, Good Governance, and Public Trust Increase Citizens’ e-Government Participation? Dual Approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA

An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Government Trust and the Sense of Public Participation——the Example of Nanjing City

Rebels in their own job: How digging into a municipal mystery turned invited youth participation in an urban planning process into uninvited activism

Participation, transparency and trust in local governance in transitional countries: the case of Vietnam

Citizens’ e-participation on agenda setting in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter?

Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity

Participatory Democracy and Sustainability. Deliberative Democratic Innovation and Its Acceptance by Citizens and German Local Councilors

Consenting Participation? How Demands for Citizen Participation and Expert-Led Decision-Making Are Reconciled in Local Democracy

Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation

New Forms Of Political Participation: Searching For Expert Citizens And Everyday Makers

The mediating role of perceptions of municipal government performance on the relationship between good governance and citizens’ trust in municipal government

The Unintended Effects of Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Peru