Methods matter in repeating ocean acidification studies

Philip L. Munday,Danielle L. Dixson,Megan J. Welch,Douglas P. Chivers,Paolo Domenici,Martin Grosell,Rachael M. Heuer,Geoffrey P. Jones,Mark I. McCormick,Mark Meekan,Göran E. Nilsson,Timothy Ravasi,Sue-Ann Watson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2803-x
IF: 64.8
2020-10-21
Nature
Abstract:<p>Nature, Published online: 21 October 2020; <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2803-x">doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2803-x</a></p>Methods matter in repeating ocean acidification studies
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether the research on the impact of ocean acidification on the behavior of coral reef fish is reproducible and the validity of these research results. Specifically: 1. **Reproducibility of the research**: Clark et al. proposed in previous studies that high - concentration CO₂ has no significant impact on the behavior of coral reef fish and questioned the reproducibility of previous studies. They believe that there are flaws in the previous experimental design and methods, leading to unreliable results. 2. **Differences in experimental methods**: Munday et al. pointed out that Clark et al.'s study did not strictly repeat the previous research methods but made changes in several key aspects. For example: - **Species selection**: Clark et al. did not use the same species as in the early studies (such as clownfish), but chose different species. - **Life stage**: Clark et al. used adult or sub - adult fish instead of juvenile or newly hatched fish. - **Ecological history**: The fish used by Clark et al. have different ecological histories and may have been exposed to different environmental conditions. - **Chemical conditions**: The pCO₂ range in Clark et al.'s experiment was larger and the temperature was higher, which may have affected the experimental results. 3. **Rationality of statistical analysis**: Munday et al. believe that it is unreasonable for Clark et al. to compare their multi - species data distribution with the results of previous studies because there are significant differences in experimental design and methods between the two. 4. **Ignoring existing evidence**: Clark et al. ignored a large amount of existing research evidence, including their own previous studies, which show that high - concentration CO₂ does affect fish behavior. Therefore, the core issue of this paper is to explore whether Clark et al.'s research conclusions on the impact of ocean acidification on the behavior of coral reef fish are reasonable and whether their claim of "non - reproducibility" is tenable. Munday et al. questioned the scientific nature and reliability of Clark et al.'s conclusions by comparing the differences in experimental design and methods in detail.