Abstract:Molecular dynamics simulation methods produce trajectories of atomic positions (and optionally velocities and energies) as a function of time and provide a representation of the sampling of a given molecule's energetically accessible conformational ensemble. As simulations on the 10-100 ns time scale become routine, with sampled configurations stored on the picosecond time scale, such trajectories contain large amounts of data. Data-mining techniques, like clustering, provide one means to group and make sense of the information in the trajectory. In this work, several clustering algorithms were implemented, compared, and utilized to understand MD trajectory data. The development of the algorithms into a freely available C code library, and their application to a simple test example of random (or systematically placed) points in a 2D plane (where the pairwise metric is the distance between points) provide a means to understand the relative performance. Eleven different clustering algorithms were developed, ranging from top-down splitting (hierarchical) and bottom-up aggregating (including single-linkage edge joining, centroid-linkage, average-linkage, complete-linkage, centripetal, and centripetal-complete) to various refinement (means, Bayesian, and self-organizing maps) and tree (COBWEB) algorithms. Systematic testing in the context of MD simulation of various DNA systems (including DNA single strands and the interaction of a minor groove binding drug DB226 with a DNA hairpin) allows a more direct assessment of the relative merits of the distinct clustering algorithms. Additionally, means to assess the relative performance and differences between the algorithms, to dynamically select the initial cluster count, and to achieve faster data mining by "sieved clustering" were evaluated. Overall, it was found that there is no one perfect "one size fits all" algorithm for clustering MD trajectories and that the results strongly depend on the choice of atoms for the pairwise comparison. Some algorithms tend to produce homogeneously sized clusters, whereas others have a tendency to produce singleton clusters. Issues related to the choice of a pairwise metric, clustering metrics, which atom selection is used for the comparison, and about the relative performance are discussed. Overall, the best performance was observed with the average-linkage, means, and SOM algorithms. If the cluster count is not known in advance, the hierarchical or average-linkage clustering algorithms are recommended. Although these algorithms perform well, it is important to be aware of the limitations or weaknesses of each algorithm, specifically the high sensitivity to outliers with hierarchical, the tendency to generate homogenously sized clusters with means, and the tendency to produce small or singleton clusters with average-linkage.

quicksom: Self-Organizing Maps on GPUs for clustering of molecular dynamics trajectories

An automatic tool to analyze and cluster macromolecular conformations based on self-organizing maps

A Fast Parallel Clustering Algorithm For Molecular Simulation Trajectories

Clustering one million molecular structures on GPU within seconds

Molecular dynamics simulation of macromolecules using graphics processing unit

GPU-specific algorithms for improved solute sampling in grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations

Fast conformational clustering of extensive molecular dynamics simulation data

Open-Source Multi-GPU-Accelerated QM/MM Simulations with AMBER and QUICK

libmolgrid: GPU Accelerated Molecular Gridding for Deep Learning Applications

MOIL-opt: Energy-Conserving Molecular Dynamics on a GPU/CPU System

Somoclu: an Efficient Parallel Library for Self-Organizing Maps

Smoldyn on Graphics Processing Units: Massively Parallel Brownian Dynamics Simulations

Multi-Level DBSCAN: A Hierarchical Density-Based Clustering Method for Analyzing Molecular Dynamics Simulation Trajectories

Efficient Generation of Molecular Clusters with Dual-Scale Equivariant Flow Matching

MDSCAN: RMSD-based HDBSCAN clustering of long molecular dynamics

Coarse Grained Molecular Dynamics with Normalizing Flows

Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms

Self Organizing Maps to efficiently cluster and functionally interpret protein conformational ensembles

Graphics Processing Unit Acceleration and Parallelization of GENESIS for Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born

Gpu Accelerated Support Vector Machines for Mining High-Throughput Screening Data