Women's mental health in times of COVID-19

Alex Sandro Rolland Souza,Gustavo Fonseca de Albuquerque Souza,Gabriella de Almeida Figueredo Praciano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000300001

2020-09-01

Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil

Abstract:Souza, Alex Sandro Rolland; Souza, Gustavo Fonseca De Albuquerque; Praciano, Gabriella De Almeida Figueredo;

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Women's mental health and COVID-19: increased vulnerability and inequalities

Margareth Arilha,Adriana P. Carvalho,Thais A. Forster,Carla V. M. Rodrigues,Bianca Briguglio,Suzanne J. Serruya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1414355

2024-10-02

Abstract:Introduction The impact of COVID-19 on mental health has become a relevant object of research. Studies have demonstrated that women have experienced greater mental health challenges, highlighting the importance of public health systems to address women's specific needs. Methods This literature review explores the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on psychological distress among women, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject and to explore how these research findings can guide public mental health care responses in crisis settings. A total of 131 studies were analyzed and four dimensions were discussed: study characteristics, factors impacting women's mental health in the pandemic setting, particularities of pregnancy and the postpartum period, and proposed interventions. Most studies exclusively addressed populations of adult women, predominantly during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Results Anxiety, depression, and stress were the most common outcomes. Lower education and income, preexisting mental health problems, and living alone or with children were risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression. Discussion A comprehensive care approach supported by public health policies and focused on intersectional factors, including race, socioeconomic status, and access to resources, is necessary to improve women's mental health care response in future crises.
Women's Mental Health in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic

Florence Thibaut,Patricia J. M. van Wijngaarden-Cremers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.588372

2020-12-08

Abstract:Even if the fatality rate has been twice higher for men than for women, the Covid-19 pandemic has affected women more than men, both as frontline workers and at home. The aim of our article was to analyze the differences observed in mental health and violence between men and women in the COVID outbreak. For this purpose, we have used all papers available in PubMed between January and July 2020 as well as data from non-governmental associations. We have thus successively analyzed the situation of pregnancy during the pandemic; the specific psychological and psychiatric risks faced by women both as patients and as workers in the health sector, the increased risk of violence against women at home and at workplace and, finally the risk run by children within their families. In conclusion, research on the subject of mental health issues during the Covid-19 pandemic is still scarce, especially in women. We hope that this pandemic will help to recognize the major role of women at home and at the workplace.
Suspension of social welfare services and mental health outcomes for women during the COVID-19 pandemic in a peripheral neighborhood in São Paulo, Brazil

Lenora Bruhn,Felipe Szabzon,Cristobal Abarca Brown,Daniela Ravelli Cabrini,Elisangela Miranda,Laura Helena Andrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.897276

2022-09-15

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, Brazilian urban peripheries have been severely affected both by the spread of the virus and by social, political, and economical dynamics, raising concerns about the psychological wellbeing and mental health of the population living in these areas. The pandemic broke out in a context of reduced public spending in social and health policies as well as in a process of erosion of social rights, fostering processes of exclusion and highlighting the association between austerity, the increase in poverty and inequality as well as in health and mental health problems indicators. This article presents the results of a qualitative participatory research that investigated subjective experiences in a peripheral neighborhood of São Paulo, Brazil, aiming to understand how contextual dynamics played a role in shaping mental health experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary team of researchers worked closely with local volunteers trained to provide emotional support calls to neighbors of the community who signed up for the project. This article presents three ethnographic cases of women who had their routines strongly affected by the suspension of public and social protection services for the containment of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, leading to psychological suffering due to the increased demand of "domestic circuits of care". We argue that within a context of austerity, the pandemic was remarkably harsh in urban peripheries and, specifically, for women with caring responsibilities. In addition to highlighting the pervasive "social protection gap", the cases presented in this paper also reveals the unequal dynamics of the social reproduction work in several layers, which falls mainly on women's shoulders. The "crisis of care", proposed by gender and feminist scholars, can contribute to understanding the psychological outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic for these women.
Mental health: health worker narratives in the context of COVID-19 in Brazil

Daniele Mometti-Braz,Rosana Teresa Onocko-Campos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1130

2023-11-24

Abstract:Introduction: During the pandemic, "staying at home" was not an option for many people, especially health workers, who were on the front lines in the fight against COVID-19 and whose mental health was threatened. Objectives: This study highlights the psychological repercussions of the pandemic and the coping strategies used by health workers in an effort to develop mental health resources. Methods: This qualitative exploratory study investigated the narratives of 14 health workers from an online focus group between August and September 2020, transcribing the meetings and performing thematic content analysis. Results: The analysis resulted in 3 categories of experience: 1) the professional as a patient, especially the fear of suffering or dying based on daily experience; 2) the fine line between providing care and being a vector of transmission, which identified worries about infecting family members and work overload; and 3) coping strategies and mental health on an individual level, such as routines, care, faith, and learning lessons, as well as on a collective level, such as prevention measures and public policies. Conclusions: Studies such as this can contribute to a framework of knowledge about coping strategies to maintain mental health among health workers. They also provide an opportunity to listen, which produces meaning, empathy, and recognition for these professionals.
Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ana Luisa Pedrosa,Letícia Bitencourt,Ana Cláudia Fontoura Fróes,Maria Luíza Barreto Cazumbá,Ramon Gustavo Bernardino Campos,Stephanie Bruna Camilo Soares de Brito,Ana Cristina Simões e Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566212

IF: 3.8

2020-10-02

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019 prompted consternation in many parts of the world. Due to its fast dissemination, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic in March 2020. Aiming to contain the spread of the virus, leaders of many countries restrained social movement, targeting to flatten the curve of contamination with social distancing. This review aimed to analyze how human behavior has changed throughout this period. We also approached the key components of the emotional reaction to the pandemic, how internal and external factors, such as personality traits, gender, the media, the economy and the governmental response, influence the social perception of the pandemic and the psychological outcomes of the current scenario. Moreover, we explored in depth the groups at increased risk of suffering mental health burden secondary to these circumstances. These include the healthcare professionals, elderly individuals, children, college students, black subjects, latin and LGBTQ+ communities, economically disadvantaged groups, the homeless, prisoners, the rural population and psychiatric patients. We also discussed several measures that might minimize the emotional impact derived from this scenario. It is crucial that the health authorities, the government and the population articulate to assist the vulnerable groups and promote emotional and psychological support strategies. Moreover, it is fundamental that the population is provided with accurate information concerning the COVID-19 pandemic.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Impact of the covid-19 pandemic on mental health and sexuality of female doctors

Nadine de Souza Ziegler,Gabriel Cardozo Muller,Fernanda Santos Grossi,Rodolfo de Carvalho Pacagnella,Julia Schneider Hermel,Janete Vettorazzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281321

IF: 3.7

2023-07-10

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: COVID-19 pandemic has changed people's lives around the world due to restrictive measures adopted by governments. The impact of this change on female sexuality needs to be further investigated, particularly between female doctors who are more at risk as they are directly involved with health care services. Methods: An online survey has been filled out by female doctors. The questionnaire evaluates sexual function, depression, anxiety, burnout, sociodemographic and professional data, and it was answered during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. The main outcome is female doctors' sexual function during COVID-19 pandemic, which was evaluated by analyzing FSFI questionnaires. The secondary outcome is related to their mental health, assessed via depression, anxiety and burnout questionnaires. Results: A sample of 388 female doctors filled out the questionnaire. The median age was 34.0 (29.0, 43.0) years old. The total FSFI median score was 23.8 [18.9, 26.8] with desire domain median of 5.0 [3.0, 7.0]. In our sample, 231 (59.5%) women had depression and/or anxiety, out of these, 191 (82.7%) had depression and 192 (83.2%), anxiety. From these samples of doctors with depression and/or anxiety, 183 (79.2%) had sexual dysfunction. Conclusion: This finding suggests that doctors are experiencing a high risk of sexual dysfunction and mental illness during the COVID-19 outbreak. A high index of depression and/or anxiety was shown in the studied population, with almost 80% of them reaching criteria for sexual dysfunction. Working in the frontline is related to worse mental health conditions. Depression and anxiety were found as potential mediators of burnout effect on sexual function.
Examining the mental health of the academic community at an institution for higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic

Waléria de Paula,Isadora Dantas Sakr Khouri,Elaine Leandro Machado,Glenda Nicioli da Silva,Leonardo Roever,Adriana Lúcia Meireles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2022.2142946

2022-11-07

Psychology, Health and Medicine

Abstract:Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Higher Education Institutions had to suspend their on-site activities and adapt to the new scenario. Therefore, the objective of the research was to investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the academic community of a Brazilian public university. This is a cross-sectional study, at a Brazilian public university, that used the baseline data from a longitudinal study carried out with employees and students. Participants answered a self-administered and confidential questionnaire in online platform, composed of sociodemographic, economic, lifestyles and mental health issues. 1,353 students and 372 employees participated. The prevalence of anxiety disorder symptoms among students and employees was 46.12% and 17.47%, depression 54.62% and 22.85% and stress 47.45% and 22.58%, respectively. The co-occurrence of symptoms was 33.56% among university students and 10.75% among employees. Falling family income, having stopped smoking and negative self-rated health, during the COVID-19 pandemic, may be the reasons for the high prevalence of co-occurrence of anxiety, depression and stress disorders among the academic community.
The mental health of Brazilian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study

Alexandre Luiz de Oliveira Serpa,André Luiz Braule Pinto,Alexandre Paim Diaz,Marco Aurélio Romano-Silva,Danielle de Souza Costa,Rui M. Joaquim,Jonas Jardim de Paula,Rafaela Guatimosim,Antônio Geraldo da Silva,Débora Marques de Miranda,Leandro F. Malloy-Diniz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2347

2022-01-01

Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the distress level among Brazilian healthcare professionals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and estimate risks by sex, age, and occupation.METHODS: In a longitudinal cohort design, a nationally distributed online survey was used to collect data from 10,490 active healthcare professionals who worked during the pandemic. Participants were mostly female, aged 18 to 82 years; 13 different health professions and all states of Brazil were represented.RESULTS: The most frequent professions were psychology, dentistry, and nursing. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) score suggested an increased distress perception among health professionals. Females showed poorer mental health than males, but the absolute rise in Global Severity Index (GSI) score was larger in males than in females. Younger adults reported more symptoms of psychological distress than older adults. The most impacted age group was between 30-39 years. Nurse technicians presented the highest risk of distress.CONCLUSION: Health professionals are essential to overcoming the pandemic; thus, their mental health status should be monitored, and features associated with increased distress should be identified. Our findings suggest distress risk should be stratified by occupation, age, and sex. Health professionals showed an increased distress perception. Women, individuals between the ages of 30 and 39, nursing personnel, and physicians were more likely to report distress compared with other health professionals.

psychiatry
Inequality on the frontline: A multi-country study on gender differences in mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Diana Czepiel,Clare McCormack,Andréa T.C. da Silva,Dominika Seblova,Maria F. Moro,Alexandra Restrepo-Henao,Adriana M. Martínez,Oyeyemi Afolabi,Lubna Alnasser,Rubén Alvarado,Hiroki Asaoka,Olatunde Ayinde,Arin Balalian,Dinarte Ballester,Josleen A.l. Barathie,Armando Basagoitia,Djordje Basic,María S. Burrone,Mauro G. Carta,Sol Durand-Arias,Mehmet Eskin,Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez,Marcela I. F. Frey,Oye Gureje,Anna Isahakyan,Rodrigo Jaldo,Elie G. Karam,Dorra Khattech,Jutta Lindert,Gonzalo Martínez-Alés,Franco Mascayano,Roberto Mediavilla,Javier A. Narvaez Gonzalez,Aimee Nasser-Karam,Daisuke Nishi,Olusegun Olaopa,Uta Ouali,Victor Puac-Polanco,Dorian E. Ramírez,Jorge Ramírez,Eliut Rivera-Segarra,Bart P.F. Rutten,Julian Santaella-Tenorio,Jaime C. Sapag,Jana Šeblová,María T. S. Soto,Maria Tavares-Cavalcanti,Linda Valeri,Marit Sijbrandij,Ezra S. Susser,Hans W. Hoek,Els van der Ven,Andréa Tenório Correia da Silva,Maria Francesca Moro,Adriana Maldonado Martínez,Josleen A. I. Barathie,María Soledad Burrone,Mauro Giovanni Carta,Marcela Ines Freytes Frey,Bart P. F. Rutten,María Teresa Solís Soto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.18

2024-03-26

Global Mental Health

Abstract:Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at increased risk for mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, with prior data suggesting women may be particularly vulnerable. Our global mental health study aimed to examine factors associated with gender differences in psychological distress and depressive symptoms among HCWs during COVID-19. Across 22 countries in South America, Europe, Asia and Africa, 32,410 HCWs participated in the COVID-19 HEalth caRe wOrkErS (HEROES) study between March 2020 and February 2021. They completed the General Health Questionnaire-12, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and questions about pandemic-relevant exposures. Consistently across countries, women reported elevated mental health problems compared to men. Women also reported increased COVID-19-relevant stressors, including insufficient personal protective equipment and less support from colleagues, while men reported increased contact with COVID-19 patients. At the country level, HCWs in countries with higher gender inequality reported less mental health problems. Higher COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with increased psychological distress merely among women. Our findings suggest that among HCWs, women may have been disproportionately exposed to COVID-19-relevant stressors at the individual and country level. This highlights the importance of considering gender in emergency response efforts to safeguard women's well-being and ensure healthcare system preparedness during future public health crises.

psychiatry
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of nursing professionals in the state of São Paulo

M. C. V. R. De Oliveira,E. Ribeiro dos Santos,E. C. Araujo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1079

2024-08-30

European Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction This is a descriptive cross-sectional clinical study with professionals from the Nursing Team (Nursing Assistant, Nursing Technician and Nurse). Objectives To assess the psychological impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on nursing staff professionals. Methods A descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study will be applied to a structured interview aimed at collecting sociodemographic and occupational data, Mental Health Scales evaluating professional exhaustion - Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and Beck's Anxiety Rating Scale to assess the state of anxiety. Results About 13,587 nursing professionals were interviewed, including nurses, technicians and nursing assistants. They were evidenced through the behavior indexes related to insomnia, the desire to cry and appetite variation may be related to the long working hours, the fear of contamination and the consequent absence from work, as well as the fear of getting sick may be related to the fact that the professional stops being a caregiver and starts to be cared for. Conclusions the study denotes the importance and need for interventions to promote and prevent mental well-being in health professionals exposed to COVID-19, these need to be implemented immediately, for nursing professionals, as they are on the front line, demanding attention Special. In this sense, the Nursing Council of the State of São Paulo created and implemented some bills such as the Obligation of Rest Rooms in Health Units, the Cuidando de Quem Cuida Program and the Yellow September Campaign in Allusion to actions for Nursing professionals for the prevention and promotion in mental health category. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

psychiatry
Impact on Mental Health Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal and Brazil

Lígia Passos,Filipe Prazeres,Andreia Teixeira,Carlos Martins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186794

2020-09-17

Abstract:Mental health effects secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic were till recently considered less important or were neglected. Portugal and Brazil are facing the pandemic in quite different ways. This study aimed to describe the mental health status of the general adult population in Portugal and Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic and analyze the differences between the two countries. A cross-sectional quantitative study was based on an online questionnaire. Socio-demographic data were collected in addition to four validated scales: CAGE (acronym cut-annoyed-guilty-eye) Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-2. For each outcome, a multiple linear regression was performed. Five hundred and fifty people answered the questionnaire (435 women). The median age was 38 (Q1, Q3: 30, 47) years, 52.5% resided in Brazil and 47.5% in Portugal. The prevalence of anxiety was 71.3% (mild anxiety was present in 43.1%), the prevalence of depression was 24.7% and 23.8% of the sample had both depression and anxiety. Isolation was a significant factor for depression but not for anxiety. Well-being was below average. Mental illness was considerably higher than pre-COVID-19 levels. Portugal and Brazil will have to be prepared for future consequences of poor mental health and contribute immediate psychological support to their adult populations.
Factors associated with status and self-perceived mental health changes in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

Rander Junior Rosa,Juliana Soares Tenório de Araújo,Thaís Zamboni Berra,Antônio Carlos Vieira Ramos,Heriederson Sávio Dias Moura,Murilo César do Nascimento,Ariela Fehr Tártaro,Ruan Victor Dos Santos Silva,Felipe Mendes Delpino,Regina Célia Fiorati,Titilade Kehinde Ayandeyi Teibo,Yan Mathias Alves,Juliana Queiroz Rocha de Paiva,Marcos Augusto Moraes Arcoverde,Alessandro Rolim Scholze,Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001636

2023-08-18

Abstract:The SARS-CoV-2-triggered Public Health Emergency of International Importance has significantly contributed to emotional and mental health issues. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with self-perceived mental health changes while facing the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study that collected data via a web survey using a validated instrument. The study included individuals over 18 years old residing in the 26 federal units and the Federal District from August 2020 to November 2022. The sample was recruited using the snowball technique. Two logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the outcomes of interest. The first analysis considered individuals who rated their mental health condition as poor as the dependent variable, while the second analysis considered individuals who reported changes in their mental health during the pandemic as the dependent variable. The study found that individuals with complete college education and those using tranquilizers or antidepressants were more likely to perceive their mental health as poor (1.97 and 2.04 times higher likelihood, respectively). Increased consumption of ultra-processed foods during the pandemic was associated with a 2.49 higher likelihood of reporting mental health changes. Participants also reported more difficulty sleeping. The negative self-perception of mental health varied across Brazil's regions and changed over time, with different patterns observed before and after the vaccination period. In 2022, most regions of Brazil classified their mental health as "poor." The study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, with increased prevalence of mental disorders and emotional problems among the population. The results highlight the presence of mental disorders and increased reporting of emotional problems among the population due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: the importance of social support in midlife women

Elizabeth S. Wenzel,Jacob L. Van Doorn,Rachel A. Schroeder,Beau Ances,Susan Bookheimer,Melissa Terpstra,Roger P. Woods,Pauline M. Maki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2024.2340476

2024-05-16

Climacteric

Abstract:Objective This study aimed to examine sex differences in factors associated with mood and anxiety in midlife men and women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

obstetrics & gynecology
Women in Pandemic COVID – 19

Dr. Deokar Rekha R.,Kamble S R.,Mane S. R.,Deokar Kalyani R.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2022.3.9.9

2022-09-08

International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews

Abstract:Women are playing a huge role in the fight against COVID-19, acting as home caregivers, community mobilizers, and frontline healthcare workers (ASHA). Women must be at the forefront of emergency response operations, social and economic recovery efforts, and attempts to improve our health systems after the pandemic if we are to truly bring health, wellbeing, and dignity for all. Additionally, it is important to maintain the strides gained in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights as we work toward gender equality. In addition, women are currently dealing with a number of health, wealth, personal, and social issues as a result of this pandemic. The effects of any disaster, whether man-made or natural, including COVID-19, differ for men and women in middle-class houses where "working from home" is an option. Women are expected to take on endless household duties because domestic employees have been laid off and everyone is always at home. Physical separation, however, means little to the unemployed working matriculation woman, who must sell produce, fill water bottles at congested public faucets, or use public restrooms in order to survive.
Mental Health and Psychological Impact during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey of Portuguese Higher Education Students

Carlos Laranjeira,Maria Anjos Dixe,Olga Valentim,Zaida Charepe,Ana Querido

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010337

IF: 4.614

2021-12-29

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant psychological impact on vulnerable groups, particularly students. The present study aims to investigate the mental and psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated factors in a sample of Portuguese higher education students. An online cross-sectional study was conducted among 1522 higher education students selected by convenience sampling. The survey assessed mental health symptoms as well as sociodemographic variables, health-related perceptions, and psychological factors. Results were fitted to binary and multivariable logistic regression models. The overall prevalences of stress, anxiety, and depression were 35.7%, 36.2%, and 28.5%, respectively. Poor mental health outcomes were related with being female, having no children, living with someone with chronic disease, facing hopelessness, and lacking resilient coping. Future studies focusing on better ways to promote mental health and wellbeing among students are warranted. It is necessary to gather more evidence on the post-pandemic mental health using robust study designs and standardized assessment tools.
MENTAL HEALTH OF THE NURSE DURING COVID-19

Aline Mendonça Rocha,Bárbara Wegda Mendes Alves,Thalita Braga Horta,Ana Luiza Lima Rodriguez,Maria Eduarda Bezerra Do Nascimento,Hanne Raissa Marialva Cadena,Katiane Serra Cavalcante

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56083/rcv4n2-003

2024-02-14

Abstract:The isolation measures and standardized safety procedures that were mandatory as measures to protect and prevent the increase and spread of contagion by COVID-19 during the 2020 pandemic, turned out to be extrinsic factors that directly affected the mental health of many people. Mainly in relation to health professionals who worked on the front lines attending to the main cases of COVID-19 in the hospital environment. Thus, the present study aims to present the mental health of nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic review of the literature was developed. The main results found showed that the pandemic had an impact on work routines, work-related stress and the personal lives of health professionals. They are at greater risk of exposure to COVID-19 infection. Extended work hours during the pandemic have led many of these professionals to burnout and other adverse psychological issues. The psychological outcomes of healthcare workers during the pandemic have been studied globally. Common problems consisted of burnout syndrome, anxiety and depression.
Mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: An international comparison of gender-related home and work-related responsibilities, and social support

Dominique Eugene,Jani Nöthling,Lorenzo Tarsitani,Christina Palantza,Davide Papola,Corrado Barbui,Richard Bryant,Catherine Panter-Brick,Brian J Hall,Agnes Iok Fok Lam,Anja C Huizink,Daniela Fuhr,Fredrick Dermawan Purba,Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz,Dhini Andriani,Judith van der Waerden,Ceren Acartürk,Gülşah Kurt,Sebastian Burchert,Christine Knaevelsrud,Anke B Witteveen,Martina Patane,Soledad Quero,Amanda Díaz-García,Naser Morina,Irene Pinucci,Marit Sijbrandij,Soraya Seedat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-024-01497-3

2024-09-05

Abstract:PURPOSE : To assess gender differences in COVID-19 related changes in home and work responsibilities longitudinally, and determine whether these differences, together with other potential risk and protective factors, are associated with depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology. Method: Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD were measured using an online survey instrument, between May 2020 and April 2021, in four waves completed at 3-monthly intervals. Analyses were based on data from the COvid MEntal healTh (COMET) survey which investigated the mental health effects of the COVID-19 outbreak spanning 13 countries on five continents in N = 7,909 participants. Results: From the first to the last wave, women reported a greater increase in home and work responsibilities, and had higher depression, anxiety and PTSD scores compared to men. Women who reported a reduction in income due to the pandemic had higher depression scores. Working harder and experiencing a reduction in income were also associated with higher anxiety scores in women but not in men. Women were more likely to score above the cut-off for depression (32.5% vs 23.6%, p < .001), anxiety (21.2% vs 14.4%, p < .001) and PTSD (21.2% vs 14.4%, p < .001) than men during the first wave. Stronger reliance on socially supported coping mechanisms was a risk factor for depression, anxiety and PTSD in men and women. Conclusion: Women were more likely to report mental health problems which may be related to the gender disproportionate increase in home and work responsibilities but not necessarily due to COVID-19 stressors.
Postpartum Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mariana Mie Teruya,Gabriel Sant'Ana Carrijo,Gleise Aparecida Moraes Costa,Mariliza Henrique Da Silva,Julia Ribeiro Targa de Lima,Julia Fontanezzi Sacramento Veltri Costa,Rodolfo Strufaldi,Cristina Ortiz Sobrinho Valete

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.22.24314126

2024-09-23

Abstract:Objective: To study the prevalence of maternal depressive symptoms in the immediate postpartum period (<7 days postpartum) during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify associated factors. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analytical study. The study population consisted of postpartum women >18 years old enrolled at the Municipal University Hospital of Sao Bernardo do Campo. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics and clinical history were administered to 90 patients in the first week of the immediate postpartum period between June and December 2021. Results: An Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score > 10 was observed in 39 (43.3%) of the postpartum women. From a multivariate analysis, the factors associated with a score > 10 on the scale were: "having no belief/spirituality" with 83% (95% CI 1.20-2.81, p<0.006), "having had more than one pregnancy" with 50% (95% CI 0.29-0.89, p<0.02), "having a previous episode of depression" with 64% (95% CI 1.02-2.65, p<0.04), and "having a previous episode of anxiety" with 83% (95% CI 1.06-3.16, p<0.03). The other factors studied did not have statistical significance. Conclusion: With the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in the prevalence of depressive symptoms in the immediate postpartum period was observed. The postpartum women who scored > 10 on the EPDS had the following common associated factors: "having no belief/spirituality", "having had more than one pregnancy", "having a previous episode of depression", and "having a previous episode of anxiety". These findings indicate the need for greater attention from health professionals to these positive factors.
Female healthcare workers and the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil: a sociological analysis of healthcare work

Silvana Maria Bitencourt,Cristiane Batista Andrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.42082020

Abstract:The article aims to discuss the care provided by female healthcare workers in Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic, based on a sociological analysis by authors who discuss such care as devalued and poorly paid work performed to a large extent by low-income women. The work involves social constructions of emotions and has used the body as a work instrument in care for others. In addition, the increasingly precarious nature of health work in Brazilian society, aggravated in recent decades, with an increase in temporary contracts, loss of labor rights, overload of tasks, and adverse work conditions, among others, adds to the increase in medical and hospital care in the Covid-19 pandemic. In this context, female healthcare workers experience lack of personal protective equipment, fear of coronavirus infection, concerns with their children and other family members, and illness and death of coworkers and themselves. The article highlights the need for government attention and management of healthcare work and professional societies, analyzing the work conditions female healthcare workers are experiencing in confronting the pandemic.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socially marginalised women: Material and mental health outcomes

Alexandra Olson,Tor-Olav Naevestad,Kati Orru,Kristi Nero,Abriel Schieffelers,Sunniva Frislid Meyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103739

Abstract:There is little knowledge about how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted people who are socially marginalised, including individuals who face barriers when attempting to access services such as social safety nets, the labour market, or housing. There is even less understanding about women living under these circumstances. The aims of this study are therefore to examine the material and mental impacts of COVID-19 among socially marginalised women (compared with socially marginalised men) as well as influencing factors. The study is based on survey data (N = 304) involving people who are clients of social care organisations in thirteen European countries. The sample includes clients: a) living in their homes, b) in facilities, and c) on the street and in temporary accommodations. Results indicate that although material impacts were not significantly different for female and male respondents, socially marginalised women have experienced more severe mental impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic than socially marginalised men. Female respondents have been significantly more worried about COVID-19 infection than men, and they report significantly more PTSD-symptoms related to the pandemic. Quantitative results indicate that these differences are related to the fact that the female respondents worry more about health risks (e.g. falling ill). Female respondents also seem to be harder hit mentally by the material impacts of COVID-19. Among the free text survey answers regarding the biggest problem for the respondents after the outbreak of the pandemic, the most prevalent reply (among both men and women) was related to material impacts of the pandemic (39% of the respondents), particularly the loss of work (65%). While women reported deterioration of social relations more often, men mentioned lacking access to services more frequently.

Women's mental health in times of COVID-19

Women's mental health and COVID-19: increased vulnerability and inequalities

Women's Mental Health in the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic

Suspension of social welfare services and mental health outcomes for women during the COVID-19 pandemic in a peripheral neighborhood in São Paulo, Brazil

Mental health: health worker narratives in the context of COVID-19 in Brazil

Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Impact of the covid-19 pandemic on mental health and sexuality of female doctors

Examining the mental health of the academic community at an institution for higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic

The mental health of Brazilian healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study

Inequality on the frontline: A multi-country study on gender differences in mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of nursing professionals in the state of São Paulo

Impact on Mental Health Due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal and Brazil

Factors associated with status and self-perceived mental health changes in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: the importance of social support in midlife women

Women in Pandemic COVID – 19

Mental Health and Psychological Impact during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey of Portuguese Higher Education Students

MENTAL HEALTH OF THE NURSE DURING COVID-19

Mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: An international comparison of gender-related home and work-related responsibilities, and social support

Postpartum Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Female healthcare workers and the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil: a sociological analysis of healthcare work

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socially marginalised women: Material and mental health outcomes