Abstract:In the context of global change drivers, specifically eutrophication and exotic species invasion, we seek to answer if plasticity in plant traits is adaptive or maladaptive for fitness in endangered, non‐endangered and invasive congeneric plant species in response to variation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability. Our results indicate that although some plant traits responded plastically to nutrient availability, they did not contribute to plant fitness. We further show differences in trait plasticity and their effects on fitness between the type of nutrient that was varied (N and P), but they were similar between endangered, non‐endangered and invasive plant species. Global change drivers such as eutrophication and plant invasions will create novel environments for many plant species. Through adaptive trait plasticity plants may maintain their performance under these novel conditions and may outcompete those showing low‐adaptive trait plasticity. In a greenhouse study, we determined if plasticity in traits is adaptive or maladaptive in endangered, nonendangered, and invasive plant species in response to variation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability (N:P ratios 1.7, 15, and 135) and whether plastic trait responses are adaptive and/or costly for fitness (i.e., biomass). Species choice comprised 17 species from three functional groups (legumes, nonlegume forbs, and grasses), either classified as endangered, nonendangered, or invasive. After 2 months, plants were harvested and nine traits related to carbon assimilation and nutrient uptake were measured (leaf area, SLA, LDMC, SPAD, RMR, root length, SRL, root surface area, and PME activity). We found more traits responding plastically to variation in P than in N. Plasticity only created costs when P was varied. Plasticity in traits was mostly adaptively neutral toward fitness, with plasticity in three traits being similarly adaptive across all species groups: SPAD (as a measure of chlorophyll content, adaptive to N and P limitation), leaf area, and root surface area (adaptive to P limitation). We found little differences in trait plasticity between endangered, nonendangered, and invasive species. Synthesis. Along a gradient from N limitation, balanced N:P supply, and P limitation, we found that the type of fluctuating nutrient (i.e., if N or P is varied) is decisive for the adaptive value of a trait. Variation in P availability (from balanced supply to P limitation) created both a stronger reduction in fitness as well as created plasticity costs in more traits than variation in N availability (from balanced supply to N limitation). However, the patterns observed in our study may change if nutrient availability is altered, either by nutrient inputs or by a shift in nutrient availabilities, for example, by decreasing N input as foreseen by European Legislation, but without simultaneously decreasing P input.

Hidden genetic variation in plasticity provides the potential for rapid adaptation to novel environments

Environmental effects on genetic variance are likely to constrain adaptation in novel environments

Adaptive divergence generates distinct plastic responses in two closely related Senecio species

Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants

Genetic Variants Underlying Plasticity in Natural Populations of Spadefoot Toads: Environmental Assessment versus Phenotypic Response

Emergence of phenotypic plasticity through epigenetic mechanisms

Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants

Plastic responses to past environments shape adaptation to novel selection pressures

Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments

Limited life‐history plasticity in marginal population of an invasive foundation species: Unraveling the genetic underpinnings and ecological implications

Plant Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Environmental Factors

Testing the evolutionary potential of an alpine plant: Phenotypic plasticity in response to growth temperature far outweighs parental environmental effects and other genetic causes of variation

Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change

Adaptive plasticity and fitness costs of endangered, nonendangered, and invasive plants in response to variation in nitrogen and phosphorus availabilities

Gene plasticity higher in hybrids

Within population plastic responses to combined thermal-nutritional stress differ from those in response to single stressors, and are genetically independent across traits in both males and females

How important is hidden phenotypic plasticity arising from alternative but converging developmental trajectories, and what limits it?

Pre‐adaptation to climate change through topography‐driven phenotypic plasticity

The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XV. Genetic assimilation, the Baldwin effect, and evolutionary rescue

Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: Genetic differentiation and additive genetic variation for induced plant defence in wild arugula Eruca sativa

High plasticity increases phenotype-environment mismatch leading to sub-optimal performance in underutilized crop species