Rural‐urban and racial/ethnic trends and disparities in early‐onset and average‐onset colorectal cancer

Whitney E. Zahnd,Scarlett L. Gomez,Susan E. Steck,Monique J. Brown,Sabha Ganai,Jiajia Zhang,Swann Arp Adams,Franklin G. Berger,Jan M. Eberth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33256
IF: 6.9209
2020-10-28
Cancer
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Incidence rates (IRs) of early‐onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) are increasing, whereas average‐onset colorectal cancer (AOCRC) rates are decreasing. However, rural‐urban and racial/ethnic differences in trends by age have not been explored. The objective of this study was to examine joint rural‐urban and racial/ethnic trends and disparities in EOCRC and AOCRC IRs.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data on the incidence of EOCRC (age, 20‐49 years) and AOCRC (age, ≥50 years) were analyzed. Annual percent changes (APCs) in trends between 2000 and 2016 were calculated jointly by rurality and race/ethnicity. IRs and rate ratios were calculated for 2012‐2016 by rurality, race/ethnicity, sex, and subsite.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>EOCRC IRs increased 35% from 10.44 to 14.09 per 100,000 in rural populations (APC, 2.09; <i>P</i> &lt; .05) and nearly 20% from 9.37 to 11.20 per 100,000 in urban populations (APC, 1.26; <i>P</i> &lt; .05). AOCRC rates decreased among both rural and urban populations, but the magnitude of improvement was greater in urban populations. EOCRC increased among non‐Hispanic White (NHW) populations, although rural non‐Hispanic Black (NHB) trends were stable. Between 2012 and 2016, EOCRC IRs were higher among all rural populations in comparison with urban populations, including NHW, NHB, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. By sex, rural NHB women had the highest EOCRC IRs across subgroup comparisons, and this was driven primarily by colon cancer IRs 62% higher than those of their urban peers. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>EOCRC IRs increased in rural and urban populations, but the increase was greater in rural populations. NHB and American Indian/Alaska Native populations had particularly notable rural‐urban disparities. Future research should examine the etiology of these trends.</p></section>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?