Experience of implementing «multidimensional school engagement scale» in russian sample

T. G. Fomina,E. V. Filippova,N. V. Goryuk,E. A. Maksimova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38006/907345-50-8.2020.314.325
2020-10-19
Abstract:The article substantiates the relevance of studying school engagement for research and practical perspectives. The authors analyze foreign psychologists’ experience of using various methods for diagnostics of school engagement, considering their advantages and disadvantages. The study presents the results of adapting “Multidimensional School Engagement Scale” (Wang et al., 2019) on the sample of Russian school students. The questionnaire is used for diagnostics of two global factors — school engagement and disengagement, each assessed by four components: behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social. The experience of using the questionnaire adapted in Russian language demonstrated that it can be used to evaluate and comparatively analyze the general level of engagement/disengagement of different grade schoolchildren, to assess the quality of educational environment, to analyze individual manifestations of school engagement/disengagement, and identify the corresponding risk groups. The questionnaire adaptation results confirmed the relevancy of considering school engagement as a multidimensional construct, supposing assessment of its behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and social aspects. A comparative analysis of the schoolchildren’ engagement/disengagement by various components makes it possible to obtain valuable data on the peculiarities of children’s reflection of their involvement in the school life. Whereas disengagement (if found) serves as a marker of a student’s maladaptation requiring attention from the school administration. The study confirms the importance of investigating school engagement for the purposes of planning activities related to increasing academic motivation, as well as for understanding the principles and quality of educational activities organization, students’ reflection of their school activities, depending on contextual factors. The authors consider the options for using the questionnaire in the practice of a school psychologist and in the field of educational psychology research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?