The use of visualization for learning and teaching mathematics
Radcliffe A. Siddo,M. Rahim
2011-12-15
Abstract:In this article, based on Dissection-Motion-Operations, DMO (decomposing a figure into several pieces and composing the resulting pieces into a new figure of equal area), a set of visual representations (models) of mathematical concepts will be introduced. The visual models are producible through manipulation and computer GSP/Cabri software. They are based on the van Hiele’s Levels (van Hiele, 1989) of Thought Development; in particular, Level 2 (Informal Deductive Reasoning) and level 3 (Deductive Reasoning). The basic theme for these models has been visual learning and understanding through manipulatives and computer representations of mathematical concepts vs. rote learning and memorization. The three geometric transformations or motions: Translation, Rotation, Reflection and their possible combinations were used; they are illustrated in several texts. As well, a set of three commonly used dissections or decompositions (Eves, 1972) of objects was utilized. Introduction and Background Why Visualization? In the literature, visualization has been described as the creation of a mental image of a given concept (Kosslyn, 1996). As such, and from the teaching point of view, visualization seems to be a powerful method to utilize for enhancing students’ understanding of a variety of concepts in many disciplines such as computer science, chemistry, physics, biology, engineering, applied statistics and mathematics. Specifically, there are many reasons that substantiate the use of visualization for learning and teaching of mathematics at all levels of schooling, from elementary to university passing through the middle and high school levels. The literature also indicates that the activity of ‘seeing’ differently is not a self-evident, innate process, but something created and learned (Whiteley, 2000; Hoffmann, 1998). As cognitive science suggests, we learn to see; we create what we see; visual reasoning or ‘seeing to think’ is learned, it can also be taught and it is important to teach it (Whiteley, 2004, p. 3; Hoffmann, 1998). Thus, teachers who have learned and became skillful in the use of visualization and ‘seeing to think’ would be able to reinforce mathematical concepts and improve the learning process in the classroom. The literature further suggests that brain imaging, neuroscience, and anecdotal evidence confirm that visual and diagrammatic reasoning is cognitively distinct from verbal reasoning (Butterworth, 1999). Also, studies of cognition suggest that visuals are widely used, in a variety of ways, by math users and mathematicians (Brown, 1998). Moreover, Whiteley (2004) stated that ”I work with future and in-service teachers of mathematics: elementary, secondary and post-secondary. They are surprised to learn that modern abstract and applied mathematics can be intensively visual, combining a very high level of reasoning with a solid grounding in the senses” (p. 1). Visualization as Justification and Explanation Visual justification in mathematics refers to the understanding and application of mathematical concepts using visually based representations and processes presented in diagrams, computer graphics programs and physical models. There are several distinct characteristics of visual justification (reasoning) in many disciplines:
Mathematics,Computer Science