Abstract:[1] When conducting model averaging for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty, the averaging weights are often evaluated using model selection criteria such as AIC, AICc, BIC, and KIC (Akaike Information Criterion, Corrected Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, and Kashyap Information Criterion, respectively). However, this method often leads to an unrealistic situation in which the best model receives overwhelmingly large averaging weight (close to 100%), which cannot be justified by available data and knowledge. It was found in this study that this problem was caused by using the covariance matrix, C-epsilon, of measurement errors for estimating the negative log likelihood function common to all the model selection criteria. This problem can be resolved by using the covariance matrix, Cek, of total errors (including model errors and measurement errors) to account for the correlation between the total errors. An iterative two-stage method was developed in the context of maximum likelihood inverse modeling to iteratively infer the unknown Cek from the residuals during model calibration. The inferred Cek was then used in the evaluation of model selection criteria and model averaging weights. While this method was limited to serial data using time series techniques in this study, it can be extended to spatial data using geostatistical techniques. The method was first evaluated in a synthetic study and then applied to an experimental study, in which alternative surface complexation models were developed to simulate column experiments of uranium reactive transport. It was found that the total errors of the alternative models were temporally correlated due to the model errors. The iterative two-stage method using Cek resolved the problem that the best model receives 100% model averaging weight, and the resulting model averaging weights were supported by the calibration results and physical understanding of the alternative models. Using Cek obtained from the iterative two-stage method also improved predictive performance of the individual models and model averaging in both synthetic and experimental studies.

Bayesian Model Averaging for Spatial Autoregressive Models Based on Convex Combinations of Different Types of Connectivity Matrices

Bayesian statistics in spatial epidemiology]

Model Averaging Estimation for Nonparametric Varying-Coefficient Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity

A Bayesian approach for the estimation of weight matrices in spatial autoregressive models

Bayesian nonparametric models for spatially indexed data of mixed type

Spatial Factor Modeling: A Bayesian Matrix-Normal Approach for Misaligned Data

A Conceptual Introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging

Frequentist model averaging for undirected gaussian graphical models

A Bayesian Multifactor Spatio-Temporal Model for Estimating Time-Varying Network Interdependence

Bayesian Inference from Composite Likelihoods, with an Application to Spatial Extremes

Ideal Bayesian Spatial Adaptation

Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics

Spatial Autologistic Model with Generalized Dependent Parameter

Bayesian Nonstationary Spatial Modeling for Very Large Datasets

Bayesian Hierarchical Spatial Regression Models for Spatial Data in the Presence of Missing Covariates with Applications

Assessing the Competitiveness of Matrix-Free Block Likelihood Estimation in Spatial Models

Fast Two-Stage Variational Bayesian Approach to Estimating Panel Spatial Autoregressive Models with Unrestricted Spatial Weights Matrices

Applications of Generalized Additive and Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Areal Safety Analysis: Case Study of an Urban Multimodal Transportation System in Chicago, Illinois

Effects of error covariance structure on estimation of model averaging weights and predictive performance

Model averaging estimation for high-dimensional covariance matrices with a network structure

Fast Bayesian estimation of spatial count data models