Atmospheric Ammonia in Beijing during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Concentrations, Sources, and Implications

Yangyang Zhang,Xuejun Liu,Yunting Fang,Duanyang Liu,Aohan Tang,Jeffrey L. Collett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00756
2020-11-02
Abstract:This study investigates the concentrations and δ<sup>15</sup>N values of NH<sub>3</sub> in Beijing during and after the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. Higher NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and lower δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>3(measured)</sub> were observed at most sites in 2020 compared to 2017. Except for a site inside a tunnel, NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations did not increase significantly after the lockdown had ended compared to those during the lockdown, while δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub>3(measured)</sub> increased by 2.1–9.9‰. Nonagricultural sources (fossil fuel and urban waste) overall contributed 81% and 62% of NH<sub>3</sub> at on-road (tunnel interior) and nonroad (CAU) sites in 2020, respectively, comparable to those in 2017 (without significant difference). The contribution of nonagricultural sources slightly increased after the lockdown compared to the contribution during the lockdown at the nonroad site and hardly changed at the tunnel interior site. Our results suggest that (1) unfavorable meteorological conditions, especially lower boundary layer heights and changes in regional transport patterns, might play a more important role than reduced anthropogenic emissions in the temporal variations of Beijing NH<sub>3</sub> and (2) the effect of reduced anthropogenic emissions, during the COVID-19 outbreak or with the future implementation of emission control strategies, on atmospheric NH<sub>3</sub> can be better demonstrated by isotope-based source apportionment of NH<sub>3</sub>, rather than only by changes in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00756?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00756</a>.Isotopic source signatures of NH<sub>3</sub> used in this study (Text S1); locations of sampling sites, concentrations of air pollutants, NH<sub><i>x</i></sub> partitioning, boundary layer height, <i>T</i> and RH, WD and WS, 72 h backward trajectories, expected δ<sup>15</sup>N-NH<sub><i>x</i></sub>, source apportionment in 2017 and 2020, and source apportionment during and after the lockdown in 2020 (Figures S1–S10, respectively); and detailed information about all sampling sites and used <i>f</i> values for sites 3 and 5 (Tables S1 and S2, respectively) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00756/suppl_file/ez0c00756_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?