Error identification and compensation for a laser displacement sensor based on on-machine measurement

Zhengcai Zhao,Dawei Ding,Yucan Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165902
IF: 3.1
2021-01-01
Optik
Abstract:Faced with many turned parts on a lathe, the profile inspection usually relies on coordinate measuring machine, which is an off-line method and may introduce repositioning or reclamping errors. Then, an accurate and efficient on-machine measuring method of integrating a laser displacement sensor on a numerical control lathe has been proposed, which can inspect the profile of the workpiece without taking it off from the machine tool. Based on the measuring process, a deviation model is constructed after analysis of the error sources. To improve the accuracy of the measurement, the deviations are identified by several other related inspection methods, which are employed to compensate the measured values. Subsequently, an additional experimental test is conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Results have shown that the positive and negative deviations in the static measurement are +4.4 μm and -2.7 μm, respectively. Then, to improve the measurement efficiency, the dynamic process is adopted, in which the workpiece rotates at the optimized parameters. Although the measuring deviations enlarge to +6.3 μm and -3.1 μm partially, the time consumption is reduced to 10 % to that of the static mode. The confidence interval analysis implies that the probability of 95 % of the authentic values will fall into the calculated intervals.
optics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the cephalometric differences in craniofacial structures (such as the position and shape of the maxilla, mandible, upper respiratory tract and hyoid bone) and head postures between children and adolescents with nasal breathing and those with mouth breathing, especially in individuals with normal facial growth patterns. The research hypothesis is that even in patients with normal facial growth patterns, there are anatomical differences in craniofacial structures between children and adolescents with mouth breathing and those with nasal breathing. To achieve this goal, the researchers used a measurable diagnostic tool to evaluate the breathing mode and applied strict screening criteria to the subjects. Specifically, they recruited children and adolescents aged 7 to 16 years who did not have diseases such as neurological or congenital diseases, genetic syndromes, craniofacial deformities, severe systemic diseases, respiratory allergies, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome or asthma. In addition, any history of upper respiratory tract surgery, orthodontic or orthognathic surgery, as well as the long - term habit of using pacifiers or bottles were excluded. The study evaluated the differences in craniofacial structures and head postures through cephalometric analysis, with special attention to the size of the upper respiratory tract. The research results show that even in individuals with normal facial growth patterns, children with mouth breathing have differences in airway size, while adolescents show differences in facial development structures and hyoid bone positions. However, there is no statistically significant difference in head postures between the two groups. These findings are of great significance for understanding the impact of breathing modes on craniofacial development and can help medical professionals better manage patients with breathing disorders, realizing that this may indicate developmental imbalance.