,Guido Rychen,Gabriele Aquilina,Giovanna Azimonti,Vasileios Bampidis,Maria de Lourdes Bastos,Georges Bories,Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,Gerhard Flachowsky,Jürgen Gropp,Boris Kolar,Maryline Kouba,Secundino López Puente,Marta López‐Alonso,Alberto Mantovani,Baltasar Mayo,Fernando Ramos,Maria Saarela,Roberto Edoardo Villa,Robert John Wallace,Pieter Wester,Paul Brantom,Birgit Dusemund,Christer Hogstrand,Patrick Van Beelen,Johannes Westendorf,Lucilla Gregoretti,Paola Manini,Andrew Chesson,

Abstract:Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of 18 compounds belonging to chemical group (CG) 22. They are currently authorised as flavours in food. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that: cinnamaldehyde [05.014] is safe at the maximum use level of 125 mg/kg complete feed for salmonids, veal calves and dogs, and at 25 mg/kg for the remaining target species; cinnamyl alcohol [02.017], 3-phenylpropan-1-ol [02.031], 3-(<i>p</i>-cumenyl)-2-methylpropionaldehyde [05.045], α-methylcinnamaldehyde [05.050], 3-phenylpropanal [05.080], cinnamic acid [08.022], cinnamyl acetate [09.018], cinnamyl butyrate [09.053], 3-phenylpropyl isobutyrate [09.428], cinnamyl isovalerate [09.459], cinnamyl isobutyrate [09.470], ethyl cinnamate [09.730], methyl cinnamate [09.740] and isopentyl cinnamate [09.742] are safe at the proposed maximum use level of 5 mg/kg complete feed for all target species; 2-phenylpropanal [05.038], α-pentylcinnamaldehyde [05.040] and α-hexylcinnamaldehyde [05.041] are safe at the proposed maximum dose level of 5 mg/kg complete feed for all target species except cats, for which 1 mg/kg is safe. No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use of these compounds up to the highest proposed level in feeds. Irritation and sensitisation hazards for skin and irritation for eye are recognised for the majority of the compounds under application. Respiratory exposure may also be hazardous. For the majority of the compounds belonging to CG 22, the maximum proposed use levels are considered safe for the environment. For α-pentylcinnamaldehyde and α-hexylcinnamaldehyde, a use level up to 0.1 mg/kg feed would not cause a risk for the terrestrial and fresh water compartments. Because all the compounds under assessment are used in food as flavourings and their function in feed is essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary.

Safety assessment of 2‐methyloxolane as a food extraction solvent

Safety assessment of the mixture of methyl‐branched and linear C14–C18 alkanamides, derived from fatty acids, for use in food contact materials

Safety assessment of the substance amines, di‐C14‐C20‐alkyl, oxidised, from hydrogenated vegetable oil, for use in food contact materials

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, exo-2-[(1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl)oxy]ethanol, CAS Registry Number 7070-15-7

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, citronellyl ethyl oxalate, CAS Registry Number 60788-25-2

Safety assessment of the substance poly(2‐hydroxypropanoic acid), n‐octyl/n‐decyl esters, for use in food contact materials

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-(3-heptyl)-1,3-dioxolane, CAS Registry Number 4359-47-1

Towards Substitution of Hexane as Extraction Solvent of Food Products and Ingredients with No Regrets

Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)

Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme bacillolysin from the non-genetically modified Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain AE-NP

Safety assessment of the substances 'wax, rice bran, oxidised' and 'wax, rice bran, oxidised, calcium salt' for use in food contact materials

Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme oryzin from the non-genetically modified Aspergillus ochraceus strain AE-P

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2,2-dimethyl-3-phenylpropanol, CAS Registry Number 13351-61-6

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-methylhexanoic acid, CAS Registry Number 4536-23-6

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-hexen-1-ol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-, CAS Registry Number 58461-27-1

Safety and efficacy of aryl‐substituted primary alcohol, aldehyde, acid, ester and acetal derivatives belonging to chemical group 22 when used as flavourings for all animal species

Safety evaluation of a second extension of use of the food enzyme α-amylase from the non-genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE-AMT

Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme laccase from the non-genetically modified Trametes hirsuta strain AE-OR

Update of the risk assessment of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food

Safety evaluation of an extension of use of the food enzyme thermolysin from the non-genetically modified Anoxybacillus caldiproteolyticus strain AE-TP

Update to RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-3-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 1617-23-8