Green policymaking in top emitters: assessing the consequences of external conflicts, trade globalization, and mineral resources on sustainable development
Jiapeng Dai,Eddy Yap Tat Hiung,Mehmet Akif Destek,Zahoor Ahmed,Jiapeng DaiEddy Yap Tat HiungMehmet Akif DestekZahoor Ahmeda School of Business,University of Wollongong Malaysia,Shah Alam,Malaysiab Department of Economics,Gaziantep University,Gaziantep,Turkeyc Adnan Kassar School of Business,Lebanese American University,Beirut,Lebanond UNEC Research Methods Application Center,Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC),Baku,Azerbaijane Department of Business Administration,Faculty of Economics,Administrative and Social Sciences,Bahçeşehir Cyprus University,Nicosia,Turkey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2319136
2024-02-24
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Abstract:The escalating levels of environmental degradation along with escalating conflicts and incidents of trade disputes among regional powers can exert a detrimental influence on the prospects for achieving sustainable development (SUD). Prior empirical works have tended to overlook the contributions of trade globalization and external conflicts to the SUD. Furthermore, prevailing studies on SUD often rely on various environmental metrics, economic growth measures, or adjusted net savings as proxies, which fall short in measuring the multifaceted essence of the SUD concept. Thus, this research work assesses the heterogeneous effects of trade globalization, external conflicts, and financial development on a comprehensive SUD index based on environmental, economic, and social factors from 1992 to 2019 in the twenty highest CO 2 emitters. The results derived from the application of the method of moment quantile regressions (MM-QR) reveal that trade globalization exerts a negative impact on SUD but its negative effect shows a diminishing trend when moving from the 10 th to 90 th quantile. Financial development likewise impedes SUD, with the degree of hindrance diminishing as quantiles ascend from lower to upper percentiles. External conflicts hinder SUD only at higher quantiles with the negative effect demonstrating an increasing trend. Furthermore, mineral resources and fossil energy pose detrimental effects on SUD, and these adverse effects exhibit a mounting trajectory as one moves from lower to upper quantiles. Finally, the policy implications of these novel outcomes are discussed.
green & sustainable science & technology,ecology