Abstract:Background: The incorporation of shared decision making (SDM) is a central part of empowerment processes, as it facilitates greater activation on the part of patients, increasing the likelihood of them gaining control over their healthcare and developing skills to solve their health problems. Despite these benefits, there are still difficulties in the implementation of SDM among healthcare professionals due to internal and external factors related to the context and health systems. Aim: To explore primary care professionals (PCPs)’ perceptions of the SDM model, based on their preconceptions and experience in clinical practice. Methods: A framework analysis was conducted on qualitative data derived from a virtual community practice forum, within a cluster-randomized clinical trial developed in the e-MPODERA project. Results: The most important points in the opinions of the PCPs were: exploring the patients’ values, preferences and expectations, providing them with and checking their understanding of up-to-date and evidence-based health information. The analysis revealed three themes: determinants of the implementation process of SDM, lack of consistency and dilemmas and benefits of PCP active listening, motivation and positive expectations of SDM. Discussion: In our initial analysis, we examined the connections between the categories of the TDC model and its application in the primary care context. The categories related to the model reflect the theoretical understanding of professionals, while those related to perceptions of its application and use show certain discrepancies. These discrepancies could indicate a lack of understanding of the model and its real-world implications or insufficient commitment on the part of professionals or the organization to ensure its effective implementation. Conclusions: Specific targeted training that addresses knowledge, attitudes and practice may resolve the aforementioned findings. Resumen Antecedentes: La incorporación de la toma de decisiones compartida (TDC) es una parte central del empoderamiento del paciente, ya que facilita una mayor activación, ganar control sobre la atención que recibe y desarrollar habilidades para resolver sus problemas de salud. A pesar de estos beneficios, todavía existen dificultades para implementar la TDC entre los profesionales sanitarios debido a factores internos de los propios profesionales y externos, relacionados con el contexto y los sistemas sanitarios. Objetivo: Explorar en el foro de una comunidad virtual de práctica (CVdP) las percepciones de los profesionales de atención primaria (PAP) sobre el modelo de TDC en función de sus ideas preconcebidas y su experiencia en la práctica clínica. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis de marco desde un abordaje cualitativo de las intervenciones hechas por los PAP en el foro de una CVdP. Esta CVdP se implementó dentro de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado por grupos desarrollado en el proyecto e-MPODERA. Resultados: Los aspectos más importantes relacionados con la TDC desde la perspectiva de los PAP incluyeron: explorar los valores, preferencias y expectativas de los pacientes, proporcionarles información actualizada y basada en la evidencia, y comprobar su comprensión. En el análisis posterior, tres categorías emergieron como los temas más relevantes: determinantes de la implementación del TDC, falta de consistencia y dilemas, y beneficios de la escucha activa de los PAP, motivación y expectativas positivas de la TDC. Discusión: En nuestro análisis inicial, examinamos las conexiones entre las categorías del modelo de TDC y su aplicación en el contexto de atención primaria. Las categorías relacionadas con el modelo reflejan la comprensión teórica de los profesionales, mientras que las relativas a las percepciones de su aplicación y uso muestran ciertas discrepancias. Estas discrepancias podrían indicar una falta de comprensión del modelo y de sus implicaciones en el mundo real o un compromiso insuficiente por parte de los profesionales o de la organización para garantizar su aplicación efectiva. Conclusión: Una formación específica que aborde los conocimientos, las actitudes y la práctica puede resolver los hallazgos mencionados. Palabras Clave: Atención primaria; Profesionales sanitarios; Percepciones; Empoderamiento; Toma de decisiones compartida; Comunidad virtual de práctica

Co-Design Process of a Virtual Community of Practice for the Empowerment of People with Ischemic Heart Disease

Exploring value creation in a virtual community of practice: a framework analysis for knowledge and skills development among primary care professionals

Implementation of a virtual community of practice to promote the empowerment of middle-aged people with multimorbidity: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Empowering patients to co‐design Covid‐19 responses: the role of online health communities

Development and Iterative Design of Peer-based Discussions about Heart Health for Women

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Improving the quality of life an empowerment of our patients with ischemic heart disease

A roadmap for empowering cardiovascular disease patients: a 5P-Medicine approach and technological integration

Co-design of cardiac rehabilitation delivery in the aftermath of COVID-19, putting the patient view back in the picture

A co-design case study of the development of heart failure e-TIPS to support self-management

Co-designing a cardiac rehabilitation program with knowledge users for patients with cardiovascular disease from a remote area

Improving heart failure care with an Experience-Based Co-Design approach: what matters to persons with heart failure and their family members?

Lessons learnt from the process of designing care coordination interventions through participatory action research in public healthcare networks of six Latin American countries

The Virtual Inclusive Digital Health Intervention Design to Promote Health Equity (iDesign) Framework for Atrial Fibrillation: Co-design and Development Study

An integrated advanced communication and coaching platform for enabling personalized management of chronic cardiovascular diseases

Partnering With Stakeholders to Inform the Co-Design of a Psychosocial Intervention for Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease

Co-creation of self-management support during inpatient stroke rehabilitation

Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions about the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study from a Virtual Community of Practice

Lessons learned about co-creation: developing a complex intervention in rural Peru

Strategies for engaging patients in co-design of an intervention

A Patient-Centered Design Thinking Workshop to Improve Patient-Provider Communication in Cardiovascular Medicine