Discussion on the Use of Taxanes for Treatment of Breast Cancers in BRCA1 Mutations Carriers
Pavel Elsakov,Lenka Foretová,P Goetz,J.W.B. de Groot,Winette T.A. van der Graaf,Gülnur Guler,Kay Huebner,Neva Elizabeth Haites,Ute Hamann,Judy W. C. Ho,Evgeny N. Imyanitov,Arvīds Irmejs,Gunta Purkalne,Marianna Bitiņa,Andris Gardovskis,Jānis Gardovskis,Youlia Kirova,A. Fourquet,Jean‐Yves Pierga,Dominique Stoppa‐Lyonnet,Lidia Larizza,Cornelis J.M. Lips,Niklas Loman,Åke Borg,Pål Møller,Håkan Olsson,Jae-Gahb Park,Siniša Radulović,Mira Brankovic-Magic,Thangarajan Rajkumar,E. Razis,Drakoulis Yannoukakos,Fernando Schmitt,Rita K. Schmutzler,Peter Simmonds,Diana M. Eccles,Jacob P. Smeltzer,Peter T. Silberstein,Henry T. Lynch,Wim Weber,Pax H.B. Willemse,Rolf H. Sijmons,Piotr J. Wysocki,Vladimír Zajac,Shu Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-5-3-119
2007-01-01
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
Abstract:BRCA1-associated cancers differ from non-hereditary cancers for many factors, including somatic mutation. It can be a subject of discussion that the natural history and response to treatment also may differ between the hereditary and sporadic subgroups. Three frequent BRCA1 mutations (5382insC, 4153delA, C61G) in the Baltic countries (Lithuania, Latvia, Byelorussia and Poland) open a way for the chip test to select a subgroup from women with breast cancer. These women with BRCA1 breast cancer have a chance to get adequate treatment, including neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. So far many retrospective studies of survival, that used the same gold standard treatment for women with BRCA1 breast cancer and for women without a mutation, have not found a difference between these groups. Some studies show a worse survival result in women with a BRCA1 mutation than women without the mutation.