Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals

Scott Marek,Brenden Tervo-Clemmens,Finnegan J. Calabro,David F. Montez,Benjamin P. Kay,Alexander S. Hatoum,Meghan Rose Donohue,William Foran,Ryland L. Miller,Timothy J. Hendrickson,Stephen M. Malone,Sridhar Kandala,Eric Feczko,Oscar Miranda-Dominguez,Alice M. Graham,Eric A. Earl,Anders J. Perrone,Michaela Cordova,Olivia Doyle,Lucille A. Moore,Gregory M. Conan,Johnny Uriarte,Kathy Snider,Benjamin J. Lynch,James C. Wilgenbusch,Thomas Pengo,Angela Tam,Jianzhong Chen,Dillan J. Newbold,Annie Zheng,Nicole A. Seider,Andrew N. Van,Athanasia Metoki,Roselyne J. Chauvin,Timothy O. Laumann,Deanna J. Greene,Steven E. Petersen,Hugh Garavan,Wesley K. Thompson,Thomas E. Nichols,B. T. Thomas Yeo,Deanna M. Barch,Beatriz Luna,Damien A. Fair,Nico U. F. Dosenbach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9
IF: 64.8
2022-03-16
Nature
Abstract:Nature, Published online: 16 March 2022; doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04492-9Combined data from three large studies, with a total sample size of around 50,000 individuals, indicate that many previous studies linking the brain to complex phenotypes have been statistically underpowered, producing inflated and irreproducible effects.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?