Abstract:The connection between individual and macroeconomic conditions and voting behavior is well‐established. We contribute to the less resolved "spatial gap" in the literature that centers on how the localized economic conditions of where voters live influence their likelihood to vote. We test how space mediates the tension between voter mobilization and withdrawal in the face of economic shocks. We consider a scenario, the Great Recession, where economic shocks were quite localized and sudden, and compile an extensive dataset of all registered voters in the four‐county Tampa metropolitan area between 2006 and 2015. Using sales prices and property characteristics from the tax assessor rolls, we estimate a neighborhood‐level shock to housing values induced by the Great Recession. Results show that when we do not account for local neighborhood variation, the Great Recession is associated with a significant decrease in voter turnout. However, when we account for localized economic shocks, we find that residents in neighborhoods with negative price shocks were more likely to vote after the Recession, especially in non‐local elections. In addition, the propensity to vote increases with the size of the negative price shock. There is some evidence that variation at the neighborhood level matters more than voter‐level heterogeneity. The positive voting response is most profound in predominantly Black neighborhoods, and, to a lesser extent, in predominantly Hispanic and the lowest income neighborhoods. Increases in the propensity to vote are robust to models controlling for baseline economic vulnerabilities, such as localized unemployment, the weakness of the local housing market and exposure to sectors hit hardest by the Recession. The results indicate that dramatic and sudden changes in localized economic conditions can drive voting behavior, and in ways that are distinct from macroeconomic drivers. In addition, the housing asset channel appears to be a powerful one, which can induce significant voting responses at the national level apart from other localized economic drivers, especially among homeowners.

Labor Market Conditions and Partisan Voting: How Unemployment Hurts the Left

Trade unions and the partisan preferences of their members: Sweden 1986–2021

Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour

Job Loss and Political Entry

Labor Unions and the Electoral Consequences of Trade Liberalization

All (economic) politics is local: Voting responses to localized price shocks during the great recession

Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote

The janus-faced nature of radical voting: Subjective social decline at the roots of radical right and radical left support

Income inequality, voters' support for public spending and the size of the welfare state. A simple political model

Earnings, labor market dynamics, and inequality in Sweden

Economic Struggles and Inflation: How Does that affect voting decision?

Introduction: Special Issue on Partisan Politics

Party Ideology and Vocational Education Spending: Empirical Evidence from Germany

A note on the labour market volatility puzzle: the role of endogenous participation

Endogenizing Labor Mobility: A Partisan Politics Explanation

Supporting environmental protection in good and bad economic circumstances

How does a poor labour market affect inequalities in access to postsecondary education? Empirical evidence from 31 affluent countries

The Heterogeneous Effects of Social Assistance and Unemployment Insurance: Evidence from a Life Cycle Model of Family Labor Supply and Savings

The Effect of Labor Market Polarization on the College Students' Employment

Political Language in Economics

Job competition, human capital, and the lock-in effect: can unemployment insurance efficiently allocate human capital