Abstract:The study of the role played by the autocracy of the late Imperial period in the history of Russia is relevant because it enables to understand the factors of its viability and its loss. Of considerable interest for the study of this topic are the judgments of contemporaries who knew the main political characters of that time, the goals and motives of their activities, domestic political circumstances. The novelty of the work lies in analysing the ideas of a liberal, a member of the Central Committee of the Cadet Party V.A. Maklakov, he gave a characteristics for the potential and weaknesses of the autocracy at the beginning of the XX century. The purpose of the study is to interpret the representations of V.A. Maklakov about the autocracy’s responsibility for solving the problem of building relationships with the public, about the struggle of traditional and new forces in the Russian bureaucracy of the early XX century, the goals of their activities, their perception of autocracy, their attitude to the constitutional monarchy. Materials and methods of the study. The sources on the topic are the texts of V.A. Maklakov: a recording of a lecture that he delivered in 1909 at Tinishevsky College, memoirs written in exile, legislative acts, and memoirs of contemporaries. The theoretical basis of the research is the theory of modernization, which characterizes the process of a traditional system’s transformation into a modern one; an axiological approach that focuses on the study of the value system; a civilizational concept that substantiates the idea of the people developing their cultural identity. Study results. Maklakov characterized autocracy in the context of the ideas of legality and the right of the individual to freedom and self-determination. The Russian autocracy cared about the greatness of Russia, but the power of the monarch was not limited by laws. The idea of legality was present in the official ideology of the XIX – early XX century. Maklakov argued that the higher bureaucracy prevented the principle of legality from taking root in the country’s governance system. In the top leadership of the country, Maklakov singled out the “old” forces that defended the autocracy, and the “healthy elements” that solved promising national tasks of Russia’s development, they contributed to the transformation of an unlimited monarchy into a constitutional monarchy, defended the idea of interaction between the government and the society. Conclusions. The autocracy proclaimed the principle of legality, but did not seek self-restraint by the constitution. The “historical power” was put on the path of constitutional development by statesmen who understood their duty to Russia. They sought to rely on liberal social forces, but the cadets did not support their program. According to Maklakov, after publishing the Manifest on October 17, 1905 and the Basic Laws of 1906, the Russian autocracy took the form of a “liberal autocracy”, since it was limited by the constitution, which created the mechanism for interaction between the government and the State Duma. Nicholas II made no further attempts to regain unlimited autocracy.

The Order of the Chief Trustee of the Kalmyk People V. A. Bashkirov on Records Management Procedure in the Department for the Kalmyk People (1892)

The history of recording the fragment of the Udmurt epic narrative “The Kalmez Knights”

Калмыки Поволжья и казахи: к истории их взаимоотношений в XVIII – начале XIX в.

Formation of New Life Strategies of the Nomadic Kazakhs the Imperial Frontier of the 19th — Early 20th Century

"Represents fertile ground for the development of the recalcitrant spirit of the population". Karkaraly district in the documents of the Omsk gendarme department at the beginning of the 20th century

Strategic directions and prospects for development AIC agroholdings

Information asymmetry and opportunism of subjects: possibilities of institutional analysis in the history of Public Administration in Russia

National Identity and Foreign Borrowing in the Legal Forms of Personnel Management: History and Modernity

THE MAIN ISSUES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF ARCHIVAL STUDIES AND ARCHIVAL AFFAIRS AT THE END OF THE 20TH - BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY

Khan’s Decree on the Appointment of the Mufti: Muslims under the Rule of the Volga Kalmyks

THE COMPOSITION AND CONTENT OF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENCE MATERIALS OF THE COUNCIL OF PEOPLE’S COMMISSARS OF THE CHUVASH ASSR ON THE MAIN ACTIVITIES DURING THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR

“To Prevent the Destruction of Precious Archives”: The Draft of the Instruction on the Caucasus Military Historical Department Activities (1900)

Khosheutovsky Ulus in the Royal Family’s Summer 1871 Travel Program: Backgrounds of Some Kalmyk Pieces from the Russian Museum of Ethnography Revisited

THE IMAGE OF THE RITUALIST IN THE DOCUMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES AND DESCRIP-TIONS OF RESEARCHERS OF THE OLD BELIEVERS OF BURYATIA (late 19th – early 20th century)

State Regulation of Military Production at Mining Plants of the Urals in the Second Quarter of the 19th Century

The language and style of criminal procedure documents of the criminal prosecution bodies of the BSSR of the mid-twentieth century

The Book Chamber of the Chuvash Republic as the Custodian of the Writing and Ethnic Culture

IDEAS OF V.A. MAKLAKOV ON THE RUSSIAN AUTOCRACY IN THE LATE IMPERIAL PERIOD

Autobiography of Yuri Knorozov: Evolution of the Document in the Researcher’s Personal File

Legal status of judicial institutions in the Kuban region in the post-reform period (1869–1920): based on the law enforcement practice materials

Diary of the Kalmyk Lama Dorji Setenov’s Trip to Mongolia