Plasma Vitamin C and Type 2 Diabetes: Genome-Wide Association Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in European Populations

Ju-Sheng Zheng,Jian’an Luan,Eleni Sofianopoulou,Fumiaki Imamura,Isobel D. Stewart,Felix R. Day,Maik Pietzner,Eleanor Wheeler,Luca A. Lotta,Thomas E. Gundersen,Pilar Amiano,Eva Ardanaz,María-Dolores Chirlaque,Guy Fagherazzi,Paul W. Franks,Rudolf Kaaks,Nasser Laouali,Francesca Romana Mancini,Peter M. Nilsson,N. Charlotte Onland-Moret,Anja Olsen,Kim Overvad,Salvatore Panico,Domenico Palli,Fulvio Ricceri,Olov Rolandsson,Annemieke M.W. Spijkerman,María-José Sánchez,Matthias B. Schulze,Núria Sala,Sabina Sieri,Anne Tjønneland,Rosario Tumino,Yvonne T. van der Schouw,Elisabete Weiderpass,Elio Riboli,John Danesh,Adam S. Butterworth,Stephen J. Sharp,Claudia Langenberg,Nita G. Forouhi,Nicholas J. Wareham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1328
2020-11-17
Diabetes Care
Abstract:OBJECTIVE Higher plasma vitamin C levels are associated with lower type 2 diabetes risk, but whether this association is causal is uncertain. To investigate this, we studied the association of genetically predicted plasma vitamin C with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted genome-wide association studies of plasma vitamin C among 52,018 individuals of European ancestry to discover novel genetic variants. We performed Mendelian randomization analyses to estimate the association of genetically predicted differences in plasma vitamin C with type 2 diabetes in up to 80,983 case participants and 842,909 noncase participants. We compared this estimate with the observational association between plasma vitamin C and incident type 2 diabetes, including 8,133 case participants and 11,073 noncase participants. RESULTS We identified 11 genomic regions associated with plasma vitamin C (P < 5 × 10−8), with the strongest signal at SLC23A1, and 10 novel genetic loci including SLC23A3, CHPT1, BCAS3, SNRPF, RER1, MAF, GSTA5, RGS14, AKT1, and FADS1. Plasma vitamin C was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio per SD 0.88; 95% CI 0.82, 0.94), but there was no association between genetically predicted plasma vitamin C (excluding FADS1 variant due to its apparent pleiotropic effect) and type 2 diabetes (1.03; 95% CI 0.96, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate discordance between biochemically measured and genetically predicted plasma vitamin C levels in the association with type 2 diabetes among European populations. The null Mendelian randomization findings provide no strong evidence to suggest the use of vitamin C supplementation for type 2 diabetes prevention.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?