Abstract:Purpose Type of audit opinion is important for all stakeholders. Firm-specific characteristics have a direct impact on the type of audit opinion. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between accounting comparability (as a micro level characteristic), financial reporting quality (as a macro level characteristic) and audit opinions. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a multivariate regression analysis to tests it hypotheses to a sample of firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2015–2019. To measure accounting comparability, the authors use De Franco et al . (2011) model, and Hutton et al . (2009) model to measure financial reporting quality. The authors use type of audit opinion, and auditor's remarks (explanatory notes) as the measure for audit opinions. Findings The authors find a negative association between accounting comparability, and the proxies for audit opinion. The authors also find that a negative association between financial reporting quality and audit opinions. These results suggest that higher accounting comparability, and higher financial reporting quality (proxied by earnings quality) increases auditor tendency to issue unmodified audit opinion. Originality/value To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study that empirically examines the association between accounting comparability, financial reporting quality and audit opinion. This study provides empirical support for the theoretical views on the association between financial reporting quality and audit opinion. The results could be of interest of both auditors and managers, especially in emerging capital markets, who seek to improve financial reporting quality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how accounting comparability and financial reporting quality affect audit opinions. Specifically, the authors studied the impact of accounting comparability and financial reporting quality on the types of audit opinions in the Iranian capital market. They believe that higher accounting comparability and financial reporting quality can reduce the likelihood of auditors issuing modified opinions, thereby improving the quality of audit opinions.
### Research Background and Hypotheses
1. **Accounting Comparability and Audit Opinions**:
- **Hypothesis 1 (H1)**: There is a negative correlation between accounting comparability and modified audit opinions. That is, the higher the accounting comparability, the lower the likelihood of auditors issuing modified opinions.
2. **Accounting Comparability, Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Opinions**:
- **Hypothesis 2 (H2)**: There is a negative correlation between financial reporting quality and modified audit opinions. That is, the higher the financial reporting quality, the lower the likelihood of auditors issuing modified opinions.
- **Hypothesis 3 (H3)**: Financial reporting quality plays a moderating role in the relationship between accounting comparability and audit opinions. That is, in the case of high financial reporting quality, the impact of accounting comparability on audit opinions is more significant.
### Research Design and Variable Measurement
1. **Accounting Comparability Measurement**:
- Using the method of De Franco et al. (2011), accounting comparability is measured by calculating the covariance of earnings of two companies in the same industry. The specific model is as follows:
\[
\text{AccComp}_{ijt} = \frac{1}{16} \sum_{t = 0}^{15} \left| \frac{\hat{\text{E(Earn)}_{iit}} - \hat{\text{E(Earn)}_{ijt}}}{\hat{\text{E(Earn)}_{ijt}}} \right|
\]
where \(\hat{\text{E(Earn)}_{iit}}\) and \(\hat{\text{E(Earn)}_{ijt}}\) are the expected earnings estimated according to the following regression model:
\[
\text{Earnings}_{it} = \alpha_i + \beta_i \text{Return}_{it} + \epsilon_{it}
\]
2. **Financial Reporting Quality Measurement**:
- Using the method of Hutton et al. (2009), financial reporting quality is measured by calculating the absolute value of discretionary accruals. The specific model is as follows:
\[
\text{TA}_{it} = \alpha_0 + \beta_1 \left( \frac{1}{\text{A}_{i,t - 1}} \right) + \beta_2 \left( \frac{\Delta S_{i,t} - \Delta \text{AR}_{i,t}}{\text{A}_{i,t - 1}} \right) + \beta_3 \left( \frac{\text{PPE}_{i,t}}{\text{A}_{i,t - 1}} \right) + \beta_4 \text{ROA}_{i,t} + \epsilon_{i,t}
\]
The calculation method of financial reporting quality (FRO) is as follows:
\[
\text{FRO}_{i,t} = \text{AbsV(DiscAcc}_{t - 1}) + \text{AbsV(DiscAcc}_{t - 2}) + \text{AbsV(DiscAcc}_{t - 3})
\]
3. **Audit Opinion Proxy Variable**:
- Audit Opinion Type (AudOpn):