Importance of dopaminergic neurotransmission for the RU 24969–induced locomotor activity of male and female rats during the preweanling period
Sanders A. McDougall,Nazaret R. Montejano,Ginny I. Park,Jasmine A. M. Robinson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-020-02011-z
2020-11-18
Abstract:There is disagreement about whether the locomotor activity produced by serotonin (5-HT) <sub>1A/1B</sub> receptor agonists is ultimately mediated through a dopaminergic mechanism or is independent of dopamine (DA) system functioning. Using a developing rat model, we examined whether DA neurotransmission is necessary for the locomotor activity produced by 5-HT<sub>1A/1B</sub> receptor stimulation. Depending on experiment, male and female preweanling rats were pretreated with vehicle, the monoamine-depleting agent reserpine, the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor 4-chloro-<span class="u-small-caps">dl</span>-phenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride (PCPA), the DA synthesis inhibitor ∝-methyl-<span class="u-small-caps">dl</span>-p-tyrosine (AMPT), or the D1 and D2 receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and raclopride, respectively. After completing the pretreatment regimen, the behavioral effects of saline and the 5-HT<sub>1A/1B</sub> receptor agonist RU 24969 were assessed during a 2-h test session. Locomotor activity in the center and margin of the testing chamber was recorded. RU 24969's locomotor activating effects were sensitive to blockade of the D2 receptor, but not the D1 receptor. The DA synthesis inhibitor (AMPT) significantly attenuated the RU 24969–induced locomotor activity of preweanling rats, as did the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor PCPA. The latter result suggests that presynaptic 5-HT<sub>1A/1B</sub> receptors may have a role in mediating RU 24969–induced locomotion during the preweanling period. DA neurotransmission, especially involving D2 receptors, is necessary for the 5-HT<sub>1A/1B</sub>-mediated locomotor activity of preweanling rats. The actions of PCPA, reserpine, and SCH 23390 differ substantially between preweanling and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms underlying these DA/5-HT interactions vary across ontogeny.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?